Latent Structure and Incremental Validity of the Semi‐Structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM‐5 (STiP‐5.1) in a Lithuanian Adolescent Sample

As personality functioning has become central to contemporary conceptualizations of personality pathology, understanding its structure and optimal assessment has emerged as an important research priority, particularly in adolescence. This study examined the latent structure of the Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STiP-5.1) and its incremental validity in predicting functional impairment beyond self-reported personality functioning. Participants were 178 adolescents aged 11-18 years, including a clinical sample (n = 104) and a community sample (n = 74). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and bifactor modeling were used to evaluate the latent structure of the STiP-5.1. Hierarchical regression analyses examined whether clinician-rated personality functioning explained additional variance in functional impairment (WHODAS 2.0) beyond self-reported personality functioning assessed with the LoPF-Q 12-18 Short. The bifactor model demonstrated the best overall fit and supported the predominance of a strong general factor. Most reliable variance was attributable to this factor, whereas self- and interpersonal-specific factors contributed little unique variance. A four-factor CFA model also demonstrated excellent fit, supporting differentiation among identity, self-direction, empathy, and intimacy. Clinician-rated personality functioning explained additional variance in functional impairment beyond self-report measures. Self-functioning, particularly the element of self-direction, emerged as a unique predictor of functional impairment. Findings support a predominantly unidimensional conceptualization of personality functioning in adolescence while retaining clinically meaningful differentiation across LPFS domains and elements. The STiP-5.1 provides unique information beyond self-report assessment, supporting multimethod approaches to the assessment of personality functioning in adolescents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Mental Health
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.70103
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Latent Structure and Incremental Validity of the Semi‐Structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM‐5 (STiP‐5.1) in a Lithuanian Adolescent Sample

Joost Hutsebaut, Rasa Barkauskienė, Elena Gaudiešiūtė, Agnė Grigaitė
Personality and Mental Health
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
article

Latent Structure and Incremental Validity of the Semi‐Structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM‐5 (STiP‐5.1) in a Lithuanian Adolescent Sample

Joost Hutsebaut, Rasa Barkauskienė, Elena Gaudiešiūtė, Agnė Grigaitė
article en

Abstract

As personality functioning has become central to contemporary conceptualizations of personality pathology, understanding its structure and optimal assessment has emerged as an important research priority, particularly in adolescence. This study examined the latent structure of the Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STiP-5.1) and its incremental validity in predicting functional impairment beyond self-reported personality functioning. Participants were 178 adolescents aged 11-18 years, including a clinical sample (n = 104) and a community sample (n = 74). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and bifactor modeling were used to evaluate the latent structure of the STiP-5.1. Hierarchical regression analyses examined whether clinician-rated personality functioning explained additional variance in functional impairment (WHODAS 2.0) beyond self-reported personality functioning assessed with the LoPF-Q 12-18 Short. The bifactor model demonstrated the best overall fit and supported the predominance of a strong general factor. Most reliable variance was attributable to this factor, whereas self- and interpersonal-specific factors contributed little unique variance. A four-factor CFA model also demonstrated excellent fit, supporting differentiation among identity, self-direction, empathy, and intimacy. Clinician-rated personality functioning explained additional variance in functional impairment beyond self-report measures. Self-functioning, particularly the element of self-direction, emerged as a unique predictor of functional impairment. Findings support a predominantly unidimensional conceptualization of personality functioning in adolescence while retaining clinically meaningful differentiation across LPFS domains and elements. The STiP-5.1 provides unique information beyond self-report assessment, supporting multimethod approaches to the assessment of personality functioning in adolescents.

Personality and Mental HealthVol. 20(4)
Vilnius University (LT), Tilburg University (NL), De Viersprong (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.