Telehealth Versus In-Person Visits in Routine Oncology Care: Comparing Patient-Reported Symptom Outcomes

Background: Evidence is limited on how patient-reported symptoms relate to telehealth use and whether telehealth visits yield comparable symptom outcomes to in-person care in routine oncology practice. Methods: An observational cohort of adult patients who received cancer treatment 6 months to 3 years prior to a scheduled oncology visit across two academic medical centers and their affiliated community sites in North Carolina and Michigan was recruited. Pre- and postvisit telephone surveys were linked to electronic health records and geocoded data. Surveys assessed being offered a telehealth visit option and six symptoms (fatigue, pain, insomnia, anxiety, sadness, and discouragement). Chi-square tests were used to compare patient-reported symptoms by visit modality, and logistic regression was used to examine symptom associations with being offered and accepting telehealth visits. Propensity score–weighted changes in symptom composite scores pre- to postvisit were compared by visit modality. Results: Among 610 patients (496 in-person and 114 telehealth visits), symptoms were common (fatigue 79.7%, pain 73.9%, insomnia 65.9%, anxiety 62.5%, sadness 64.4%, and discouragement 35.1%). A telehealth visit option was offered to 24.8% of patients, among whom 66.2% accepted it. Patients reporting sadness were less likely to be offered a telehealth visit than those without sadness (22.1% vs. 29.5%; p = 0.04) and, if offered, were less likely to accept a telehealth visit (59.8% vs. 75.0%; p = 0.03). In contrast, patients reporting pain were more likely to be offered telehealth than those without pain (26.6% vs. 19.5%; p = 0.04). Changes in composite symptom scores from pre- to postvisit were small and not statistically significant for either in-person (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.05, 0.01) or telehealth visits (95% CI: −0.12, 0.05). Conclusion: Although access to telehealth oncology visits varies by symptom presentation, routinely offered and accepted telehealth visits appear to lead to near-term symptom outcomes similar to in-person visits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15305627261487924
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Telehealth Versus In-Person Visits in Routine Oncology Care: Comparing Patient-Reported Symptom Outcomes

Yujia Hou, Matthew R. Dunn, Ilona Fridman, J S Stein et al.
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Telehealth Versus In-Person Visits in Routine Oncology Care: Comparing Patient-Reported Symptom Outcomes

Yujia Hou, Matthew R. Dunn, Ilona Fridman, J S Stein, Soroush Fariman, Christine Neslund-Dudas, William A. Wood, Jennifer Elston Lafata, Samantha Tam, Regina Jones
article en

Abstract

Background: Evidence is limited on how patient-reported symptoms relate to telehealth use and whether telehealth visits yield comparable symptom outcomes to in-person care in routine oncology practice. Methods: An observational cohort of adult patients who received cancer treatment 6 months to 3 years prior to a scheduled oncology visit across two academic medical centers and their affiliated community sites in North Carolina and Michigan was recruited. Pre- and postvisit telephone surveys were linked to electronic health records and geocoded data. Surveys assessed being offered a telehealth visit option and six symptoms (fatigue, pain, insomnia, anxiety, sadness, and discouragement). Chi-square tests were used to compare patient-reported symptoms by visit modality, and logistic regression was used to examine symptom associations with being offered and accepting telehealth visits. Propensity score–weighted changes in symptom composite scores pre- to postvisit were compared by visit modality. Results: Among 610 patients (496 in-person and 114 telehealth visits), symptoms were common (fatigue 79.7%, pain 73.9%, insomnia 65.9%, anxiety 62.5%, sadness 64.4%, and discouragement 35.1%). A telehealth visit option was offered to 24.8% of patients, among whom 66.2% accepted it. Patients reporting sadness were less likely to be offered a telehealth visit than those without sadness (22.1% vs. 29.5%; p = 0.04) and, if offered, were less likely to accept a telehealth visit (59.8% vs. 75.0%; p = 0.03). In contrast, patients reporting pain were more likely to be offered telehealth than those without pain (26.6% vs. 19.5%; p = 0.04). Changes in composite symptom scores from pre- to postvisit were small and not statistically significant for either in-person (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.05, 0.01) or telehealth visits (95% CI: −0.12, 0.05). Conclusion: Although access to telehealth oncology visits varies by symptom presentation, routinely offered and accepted telehealth visits appear to lead to near-term symptom outcomes similar to in-person visits.

Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Henry Ford Health System (US), Hackensack Meridian Health (US), Center for Discovery (US)
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.