Standard Elements in Studies of Adverse Events and Medical Error: the SESAME statement

Variability and persistent gaps in reporting have been consistently observed across studies evaluating adverse events in healthcare, dating back to the early days of the patient safety movement. Incomplete descriptions-particularly missing details regarding study design, conduct, methodologies and applied definitions-impede interpretation, hinder critical appraisal and limit reproducibility. These deficiencies not only obstruct a shared understanding of findings but also diminish the overall impact such studies may have on patient safety initiatives and policy development. To address these challenges and enhance the quality of reporting, we developed the SESAME (Standard Elements in Studies of Adverse Events and Medical Error) reporting guideline. SESAME is a 44-item checklist designed to support comprehensive and standardised reporting in studies evaluating potential patient harm. The guideline was developed over a 2-year period by an international, multidisciplinary panel through a consensus-driven process aligned with EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of Health Research Network) standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient Safety
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000001583
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Standard Elements in Studies of Adverse Events and Medical Error: the SESAME statement

Ryan M. Schneider, Richard T. Griffey, Anne WS Rutjes, David C. Stockwell et al.
1 citations
Journal of Patient Safety
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
10.49
article

Standard Elements in Studies of Adverse Events and Medical Error: the SESAME statement

Ryan M. Schneider, Richard T. Griffey, Anne WS Rutjes, David C. Stockwell, Maria Unbeck, Christopher R. Carpenter, Lee Adler, David Classen, Rachel Ancona, The SESAME Development Team
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Variability and persistent gaps in reporting have been consistently observed across studies evaluating adverse events in healthcare, dating back to the early days of the patient safety movement. Incomplete descriptions-particularly missing details regarding study design, conduct, methodologies and applied definitions-impede interpretation, hinder critical appraisal and limit reproducibility. These deficiencies not only obstruct a shared understanding of findings but also diminish the overall impact such studies may have on patient safety initiatives and policy development. To address these challenges and enhance the quality of reporting, we developed the SESAME (Standard Elements in Studies of Adverse Events and Medical Error) reporting guideline. SESAME is a 44-item checklist designed to support comprehensive and standardised reporting in studies evaluating potential patient harm. The guideline was developed over a 2-year period by an international, multidisciplinary panel through a consensus-driven process aligned with EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of Health Research Network) standards.

Journal of Patient Safety
Dalarna University (SE), Mayo Clinic (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Utah (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Photometrics (United States) (US), Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences (IT), Cancer Institute of Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
10.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.