Study on load-bearing behavior and failure analysis of GRS abutments with gabion facing

To evaluate the load-carrying behavior and failure mechanisms of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) bridge abutments with gabion facing, four large-scale model tests were conducted under localized vertical loading. Different reinforcement spacings and geogrids were adopted as experimental variables. Beam seat settlement, lateral facing displacement, additional vertical stress, and reinforcement tensile strain were continuously measured, and the failure modes were also analyzed based on post-loading observations. The results revealed that, reducing reinforcement spacing significantly increased the ultimate bearing capacity and reduced both settlement and facing deformation. The two geogrids with different grid configurations and rib arrangements exhibited different deformation responses under higher loading conditions. Furthermore, the measured additional vertical stress and reinforcement strain distributions indicated that localized vertical loads mainly affected the upper to mid-upper portion of the abutment, where stress concentration and reinforcement mobilization were most pronounced. The observed failure mode was characterized by progressive relative movement between the reinforcement and gabion facing, followed by excessive lateral facing deformation and eventually toppling of the upper facing. These findings provide insights into the load transfer and failure mechanisms of gabion-faced GRS abutments employing frictional reinforcement-facing connections and offer useful references for engineering design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geosynthetics International
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.26.00014
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Study on load-bearing behavior and failure analysis of GRS abutments with gabion facing

Ivan Puig Damians, C. Xu, G. Li, X. Mei et al.
Geosynthetics International
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Study on load-bearing behavior and failure analysis of GRS abutments with gabion facing

Ivan Puig Damians, C. Xu, G. Li, X. Mei, H. Zhang, Q. Wang
article en

Abstract

To evaluate the load-carrying behavior and failure mechanisms of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) bridge abutments with gabion facing, four large-scale model tests were conducted under localized vertical loading. Different reinforcement spacings and geogrids were adopted as experimental variables. Beam seat settlement, lateral facing displacement, additional vertical stress, and reinforcement tensile strain were continuously measured, and the failure modes were also analyzed based on post-loading observations. The results revealed that, reducing reinforcement spacing significantly increased the ultimate bearing capacity and reduced both settlement and facing deformation. The two geogrids with different grid configurations and rib arrangements exhibited different deformation responses under higher loading conditions. Furthermore, the measured additional vertical stress and reinforcement strain distributions indicated that localized vertical loads mainly affected the upper to mid-upper portion of the abutment, where stress concentration and reinforcement mobilization were most pronounced. The observed failure mode was characterized by progressive relative movement between the reinforcement and gabion facing, followed by excessive lateral facing deformation and eventually toppling of the upper facing. These findings provide insights into the load transfer and failure mechanisms of gabion-faced GRS abutments employing frictional reinforcement-facing connections and offer useful references for engineering design.

Geosynthetics International
Tongji University (CN), North University of China (CN), WuXi AppTec (China) (CN), Manchester Airport (GB), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Scholarship Council
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.