Preferences for the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies to help detect skin cancer in primary care settings: a UK-wide discrete choice experiment (DCE)

BACKGROUND: AI technologies could help triage suspicious skin lesions. The aim of this study was to examine preferences of general practitioners (GPs), patients, and members of the public for different attributes of AI technologies to help detect skin cancer. METHODS: A DCE using online surveys, with choice scenarios based on: false negative and positive rates, cost, location of AI technology, efficacy on different skin tones, and guideline recommendations. Data were analysed using alternative-specific conditional logit regression models. RESULTS: 2302 participants completed the survey. All attributes significantly influenced the respondents' preferences. Ranking of attributes by relative importance was the same for GPs, patients, and members of the public: false negative rate was the most important attribute, followed by skin tones on which the technology had been developed and tested. False negative results had a significantly greater negative effect on GP choices than for other groups. Participants preferred AI technologies used by healthcare professionals in a GP surgery over AI technologies patients use at home. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of AI technologies to detect skin cancer should focus on minimising false negative rates. Development and testing of AI technologies using data across all skin tones is essential. Preferences for AI technologies could have significant implications for successful implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-026-03611-x
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Preferences for the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies to help detect skin cancer in primary care settings: a UK-wide discrete choice experiment (DCE)

Stephen Morris, O. T. G. Jones, M. van der Schaar, Natalia Calanzani et al.
British Journal of Cancer
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

Preferences for the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies to help detect skin cancer in primary care settings: a UK-wide discrete choice experiment (DCE)

Stephen Morris, O. T. G. Jones, M. van der Schaar, Natalia Calanzani, Fiona M. Walter, Jon Emery, Rubeta N. Matin
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: AI technologies could help triage suspicious skin lesions. The aim of this study was to examine preferences of general practitioners (GPs), patients, and members of the public for different attributes of AI technologies to help detect skin cancer. METHODS: A DCE using online surveys, with choice scenarios based on: false negative and positive rates, cost, location of AI technology, efficacy on different skin tones, and guideline recommendations. Data were analysed using alternative-specific conditional logit regression models. RESULTS: 2302 participants completed the survey. All attributes significantly influenced the respondents' preferences. Ranking of attributes by relative importance was the same for GPs, patients, and members of the public: false negative rate was the most important attribute, followed by skin tones on which the technology had been developed and tested. False negative results had a significantly greater negative effect on GP choices than for other groups. Participants preferred AI technologies used by healthcare professionals in a GP surgery over AI technologies patients use at home. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of AI technologies to detect skin cancer should focus on minimising false negative rates. Development and testing of AI technologies using data across all skin tones is essential. Preferences for AI technologies could have significant implications for successful implementation.

British Journal of Cancer
The University of Melbourne (AU), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Nanyang Technological University (SG), University of Aberdeen (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), At Bristol (GB), University of Bristol (GB), Primary Health Care (QA), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.