Reporting Thresholds Disrupt European Industrial Emissions Records: Evidence for Carry-Forward Display of Below-Threshold Declarations

Pollutant registers require exact values only above reporting thresholds, so an absent numeric record can represent zero emissions, a positive release below the threshold, facility closure, or missing data. Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 introduces a below-threshold declaration to resolve this ambiguity. This study uses a counterfactual simulation based on historical proxy data to evaluate how that declaration should appear in the public record. European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR) data for 2007–2024 are linked to EU Large Combustion Plants records and compared with England’s Pollution Inventory. Numeric reporting rose by 53.25 percentage points at the statutory nitrogen oxide and sulphur oxide thresholds. Among 900 comparable exits from numeric reporting, 90.0% retained positive linked emissions. A declaration shown only when status changed raised adjacent-year continuity from 42.22% to 47.02%. Carry-forward display raised continuity to 84.61%, matching annual declaration with 77.2% fewer status reports. England’s lower-threshold register confirmed positive releases below the European threshold. Carry-forward display should be the default implementation of Article 6(2), accompanied by post-implementation verification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18189352
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reporting Thresholds Disrupt European Industrial Emissions Records: Evidence for Carry-Forward Display of Below-Threshold Declarations

Jiawei Xu
Sustainability
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Reporting Thresholds Disrupt European Industrial Emissions Records: Evidence for Carry-Forward Display of Below-Threshold Declarations

Jiawei Xu
article en

Abstract

Pollutant registers require exact values only above reporting thresholds, so an absent numeric record can represent zero emissions, a positive release below the threshold, facility closure, or missing data. Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 introduces a below-threshold declaration to resolve this ambiguity. This study uses a counterfactual simulation based on historical proxy data to evaluate how that declaration should appear in the public record. European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR) data for 2007–2024 are linked to EU Large Combustion Plants records and compared with England’s Pollution Inventory. Numeric reporting rose by 53.25 percentage points at the statutory nitrogen oxide and sulphur oxide thresholds. Among 900 comparable exits from numeric reporting, 90.0% retained positive linked emissions. A declaration shown only when status changed raised adjacent-year continuity from 42.22% to 47.02%. Carry-forward display raised continuity to 84.61%, matching annual declaration with 77.2% fewer status reports. England’s lower-threshold register confirmed positive releases below the European threshold. Carry-forward display should be the default implementation of Article 6(2), accompanied by post-implementation verification.

SustainabilityVol. 18(18)
Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.