Author, editor, or reviewer? A framework for the ethical use of AI in psychological assessment report writing

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly influences psychological assessment report writing workflows, introducing new efficiencies alongside distinct ethical risks. APA offers broad professional and ethical guidance but do not address the specific risks unique to AI-assisted report writing. Building on prior work identifying ethical concerns of AI use in psychology, this article outlines the distinct risks of integrating AI into assessment report workflows. This article then introduces the Assessment Workflow AI Risk Evaluation (AWARE) framework, a four-tier model grounded in automation theory and tailored to distinct ethical risks in this context. AWARE offers psychologists a structured approach to evaluate when and how to ethically integrate AI into report workflows. Recommended safeguards emphasize preserving independent clinical reasoning, maintaining defensibility, ensuring accuracy, and facilitating appropriate client transparency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics & Behavior
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2026.2729686
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Author, editor, or reviewer? A framework for the ethical use of AI in psychological assessment report writing

Raechel Popek
Ethics & Behavior
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Author, editor, or reviewer? A framework for the ethical use of AI in psychological assessment report writing

Raechel Popek
article en

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly influences psychological assessment report writing workflows, introducing new efficiencies alongside distinct ethical risks. APA offers broad professional and ethical guidance but do not address the specific risks unique to AI-assisted report writing. Building on prior work identifying ethical concerns of AI use in psychology, this article outlines the distinct risks of integrating AI into assessment report workflows. This article then introduces the Assessment Workflow AI Risk Evaluation (AWARE) framework, a four-tier model grounded in automation theory and tailored to distinct ethical risks in this context. AWARE offers psychologists a structured approach to evaluate when and how to ethically integrate AI into report workflows. Recommended safeguards emphasize preserving independent clinical reasoning, maintaining defensibility, ensuring accuracy, and facilitating appropriate client transparency.

Ethics & Behavior
University of Iowa (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.