Colonial accounting and postcolonial resistance: Aboriginal Stolen Wages in Australia

This paper advances critical accounting scholarship by exposing the constitutive role of accounting in producing and reproducing the racialised power structures of British settler colonialism in Australia. Australia remains the only ex-British settler colony without formal recognition of, or treaty with, its Indigenous population and Aboriginal Australians continue to experience inter-generational trauma underlined by extreme poverty, poor physical and mental health, and shorter life expectancy. We argue that colonial and postcolonial accounting systems have perpetuated racial biases and legitimised colonial institutions including racist protectionist legislation enabling a system of institutionalised peonage in Australia. Drawing on Bhabha's theorisation of hybridity and the ‘third space’ we conceptualise the Stolen Wages Case , a class action brought by Aboriginal pastoral workers in Queensland, as a site where colonised subjects strategically appropriate the epistemic tools of the State to contest the subjectivities imposed upon them. The case's recognition of oral testimony, its acknowledgement of Aboriginal epistemologies, and its calculation of the ‘reasonable value’ of stolen labour serve to rupture the ‘great Australian silence’ of Aboriginal labour exploitation. Our theoretical contribution lies in demonstrating how accounting functions as a colonial technology that fixes racial hierarchies while simultaneously providing openings for counter-hegemonic resistance. By adopting a hybrid epistemology, we emphasize the potential for collaborative resistance and recognition of historical injustices within a discursive ‘third space’. The successful resolution of the Stolen Wages Case exemplifies the emancipatory potential of legal and accounting mechanisms in addressing colonial legacies. This research contributes to understanding the role of accounting in sustaining colonial oppression and offers insights into pathways for postcolonial accountability and reconciliation in Australia and beyond.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2026.102884
Primary Topic
Accounting and Organizational Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Colonial accounting and postcolonial resistance: Aboriginal Stolen Wages in Australia

Daniel Murphy, Lee Moerman
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
Accounting and Organizational Management
article

Colonial accounting and postcolonial resistance: Aboriginal Stolen Wages in Australia

Daniel Murphy, Lee Moerman
article en

Abstract

This paper advances critical accounting scholarship by exposing the constitutive role of accounting in producing and reproducing the racialised power structures of British settler colonialism in Australia. Australia remains the only ex-British settler colony without formal recognition of, or treaty with, its Indigenous population and Aboriginal Australians continue to experience inter-generational trauma underlined by extreme poverty, poor physical and mental health, and shorter life expectancy. We argue that colonial and postcolonial accounting systems have perpetuated racial biases and legitimised colonial institutions including racist protectionist legislation enabling a system of institutionalised peonage in Australia. Drawing on Bhabha's theorisation of hybridity and the ‘third space’ we conceptualise the Stolen Wages Case , a class action brought by Aboriginal pastoral workers in Queensland, as a site where colonised subjects strategically appropriate the epistemic tools of the State to contest the subjectivities imposed upon them. The case's recognition of oral testimony, its acknowledgement of Aboriginal epistemologies, and its calculation of the ‘reasonable value’ of stolen labour serve to rupture the ‘great Australian silence’ of Aboriginal labour exploitation. Our theoretical contribution lies in demonstrating how accounting functions as a colonial technology that fixes racial hierarchies while simultaneously providing openings for counter-hegemonic resistance. By adopting a hybrid epistemology, we emphasize the potential for collaborative resistance and recognition of historical injustices within a discursive ‘third space’. The successful resolution of the Stolen Wages Case exemplifies the emancipatory potential of legal and accounting mechanisms in addressing colonial legacies. This research contributes to understanding the role of accounting in sustaining colonial oppression and offers insights into pathways for postcolonial accountability and reconciliation in Australia and beyond.

Critical Perspectives on AccountingVol. 104
Charles Sturt University (AU), University of Wollongong (AU)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Accounting and Organizational Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.