Comparison of Oxford Nanopore and Sequencing-by-Synthesis Technologies for Sequencing cell-free bacterial DNA

The measurement of cell-free DNA is increasingly applied in clinical research, including for liquid biopsies for early disease detection and monitoring, as well as in personalised medicine. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA), typically ~ 150–200 bp, can be measured by PCR-based approaches and Next-Generation Sequencing. While cfDNA is routinely measured, cell-free bacterial DNA (cbDNA), the subset of cfDNA derived from bacteria, is not. Here, we compared Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) with sequencing-by-synthesis (SBS) for the measurement of cbDNA in 70 plasma samples and controls. We found that both platforms could successfully measure these low abundance fragments, closely matching the theoretical concentrations of control samples. However, platform-specific differences were observed in microbial taxonomic profiles from biological samples. Sequencing-by-synthesis generated substantially more total reads, although cbDNA read counts were comparable between platforms. ONT produced longer read lengths, SBS produced reads of higher quality. These results indicate that sequencing platform can influence the inferred microbial composition and diversity. Platform selection should be guided by study aims, required taxonomic resolution, and practical considerations such as sample volume availability, turnaround time and bioinformatic requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-69111-3
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Oxford Nanopore and Sequencing-by-Synthesis Technologies for Sequencing cell-free bacterial DNA

Allison L. Miller, Christopher J. Pemberton, Kirsty M. Danielson, Rachel V. Purcell et al.
Scientific Reports
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

Comparison of Oxford Nanopore and Sequencing-by-Synthesis Technologies for Sequencing cell-free bacterial DNA

Allison L. Miller, Christopher J. Pemberton, Kirsty M. Danielson, Rachel V. Purcell, Arielle K. Sulit, Sarah Appleby
article en

Abstract

The measurement of cell-free DNA is increasingly applied in clinical research, including for liquid biopsies for early disease detection and monitoring, as well as in personalised medicine. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA), typically ~ 150–200 bp, can be measured by PCR-based approaches and Next-Generation Sequencing. While cfDNA is routinely measured, cell-free bacterial DNA (cbDNA), the subset of cfDNA derived from bacteria, is not. Here, we compared Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) with sequencing-by-synthesis (SBS) for the measurement of cbDNA in 70 plasma samples and controls. We found that both platforms could successfully measure these low abundance fragments, closely matching the theoretical concentrations of control samples. However, platform-specific differences were observed in microbial taxonomic profiles from biological samples. Sequencing-by-synthesis generated substantially more total reads, although cbDNA read counts were comparable between platforms. ONT produced longer read lengths, SBS produced reads of higher quality. These results indicate that sequencing platform can influence the inferred microbial composition and diversity. Platform selection should be guided by study aims, required taxonomic resolution, and practical considerations such as sample volume availability, turnaround time and bioinformatic requirements.

Scientific Reports
University of Otago (NZ)
National Heart Foundation of New Zealand, Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust, Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, Health Research Council of New Zealand
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.