Understanding the peacebuilding potential of truth commission recommendations through a public administration lens: The Latin American experience

This article places truth commission recommendations, the subject of some attention in transitional justice scholarship, at the intersection of peace studies and public administration. Based on data on approximately 1,000 recommendations found in 13 Latin American reports published between 1984 and 2014, we reflect on the role of public administration in implementation. Specifically, we examine challenges surrounding multiple interpretations and negotiations among stakeholders. We find that how recommendations are designed, tracked, and institutionalized is filtered primarily through political will, the capacities and cultures of public agencies, the discretion of public servants, and interagency coordination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Administrative Theory & Praxis
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2026.2729507
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the peacebuilding potential of truth commission recommendations through a public administration lens: The Latin American experience

Adriana Rudling, Eric Wiebelhaus‐Brahm, Derek R. Slagle
Administrative Theory & Praxis
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

Understanding the peacebuilding potential of truth commission recommendations through a public administration lens: The Latin American experience

Adriana Rudling, Eric Wiebelhaus‐Brahm, Derek R. Slagle
article en

Abstract

This article places truth commission recommendations, the subject of some attention in transitional justice scholarship, at the intersection of peace studies and public administration. Based on data on approximately 1,000 recommendations found in 13 Latin American reports published between 1984 and 2014, we reflect on the role of public administration in implementation. Specifically, we examine challenges surrounding multiple interpretations and negotiations among stakeholders. We find that how recommendations are designed, tracked, and institutionalized is filtered primarily through political will, the capacities and cultures of public agencies, the discretion of public servants, and interagency coordination.

Administrative Theory & Praxis
University of Arkansas at Little Rock (US), Binghamton University (US), William & Mary (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.