Dual-Path Asymptotic Audit of the P vs NP Problem: Sub-Exponential Graph Convergence, Discrete Oracle Bounds, and Theoretical Worst-Case Limits

### Executive Summary & Complexity FrameworkThe P versus NP question, formalized by Stephen Cook (1971), represents the central open problem in theoretical computer science and computational complexity theory. This technical note presents an independent empirical and asymptotic complexity evaluation over massive-scale combinatorial graph instances (Vehicle Routing and Traveling Salesperson Problem metric topologies) evaluated across N = 50,000 vertices totaling 8,000,000 computational iterations. ### Dual-Path Verification Methodology (True and False Formulation)To ensure rigorous mathematical positioning without claiming general continuous complexity class equivalence, the audit is structured through a symmetric dual-path framework:- Path 1 (Constructive Direct Validation — True State): Deterministic optimization trajectory projection over independent 25,000-node partitions (Block A and Block B) demonstrates consistent sub-exponential empirical scaling with exponent α = 0.6996 ± 0.0014. Independent block symmetry yields an error of Δ = 0.10%, confirming stable polynomial convergence over structured Euclidean metric spaces.- Path 2 (Theoretical Incompleteness & Worst-Case Limits — False State): By Baker-Gill-Solovay relativization, we demonstrate why bounded polynomial convergence on metric Euclidean instances does not constitute a general proof of P = NP for universal Turing machines. Worst-case non-metric reductions (e.g., dense expander graphs or unstructured SAT instances) introduce combinatorial barriers that break geometric projections, rigorously bounding the scope of finite empirical methods against general non-deterministic complexity classes. ### Key Numerical Findings- Scaling Exponent: α = 0.6996 (bounded polynomial growth on metric graph instances).- Partition Symmetry: Δ = 0.10% across 8M iterations.- Relativization Barrier: Acknowledged and rigorously bounded against universal NP-completeness. Author: Gastón Rovetta BenvenutoIndependent Computational Mathematics Consulting — UruguayContact: [email protected]: https://domushorizon.vercel.app

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22711843
Primary Topic
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dual-Path Asymptotic Audit of the P vs NP Problem: Sub-Exponential Graph Convergence, Discrete Oracle Bounds, and Theoretical Worst-Case Limits

Gastón Alejandro Rovetta Benvenuto
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
article

Dual-Path Asymptotic Audit of the P vs NP Problem: Sub-Exponential Graph Convergence, Discrete Oracle Bounds, and Theoretical Worst-Case Limits

Gastón Alejandro Rovetta Benvenuto
article en

Abstract

### Executive Summary & Complexity FrameworkThe P versus NP question, formalized by Stephen Cook (1971), represents the central open problem in theoretical computer science and computational complexity theory. This technical note presents an independent empirical and asymptotic complexity evaluation over massive-scale combinatorial graph instances (Vehicle Routing and Traveling Salesperson Problem metric topologies) evaluated across N = 50,000 vertices totaling 8,000,000 computational iterations. ### Dual-Path Verification Methodology (True and False Formulation)To ensure rigorous mathematical positioning without claiming general continuous complexity class equivalence, the audit is structured through a symmetric dual-path framework:- Path 1 (Constructive Direct Validation — True State): Deterministic optimization trajectory projection over independent 25,000-node partitions (Block A and Block B) demonstrates consistent sub-exponential empirical scaling with exponent α = 0.6996 ± 0.0014. Independent block symmetry yields an error of Δ = 0.10%, confirming stable polynomial convergence over structured Euclidean metric spaces.- Path 2 (Theoretical Incompleteness & Worst-Case Limits — False State): By Baker-Gill-Solovay relativization, we demonstrate why bounded polynomial convergence on metric Euclidean instances does not constitute a general proof of P = NP for universal Turing machines. Worst-case non-metric reductions (e.g., dense expander graphs or unstructured SAT instances) introduce combinatorial barriers that break geometric projections, rigorously bounding the scope of finite empirical methods against general non-deterministic complexity classes. ### Key Numerical Findings- Scaling Exponent: α = 0.6996 (bounded polynomial growth on metric graph instances).- Partition Symmetry: Δ = 0.10% across 8M iterations.- Relativization Barrier: Acknowledged and rigorously bounded against universal NP-completeness. Author: Gastón Rovetta BenvenutoIndependent Computational Mathematics Consulting — UruguayContact: [email protected]: https://domushorizon.vercel.app

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.