Biomechanical comparison of PFNA combined with the modified candy-package wiring technique versus PFNA alone in complex unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures

Proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) may not provide sufficient control of unstable fracture fragments in complex intertrochanteric fractures. The modified candy-package wiring technique may supplement PFNA by improving resistance to rotational and shear displacement. This biomechanical model study compared PFNA combined with modified candy-package wiring with PFNA alone in an Evans type III intertrochanteric fracture model. Ten standardized femoral fracture models were randomly allocated to a PFNA group (n = 5) or a PFNA plus modified candy-package wiring group (PFNA + MCW group; n = 5). Torsional and axial compression tests were performed. Three repeated loading cycles were conducted for each specimen as conditioning cycles; the prespecified third cycle was used for analysis. Torsional stiffness was calculated as the change in torque divided by the corresponding change in angular displacement (Kt = Δ T /Δ θ ). The mean torsional angle was significantly lower in the PFNA + MCW group than in the PFNA group (2.09 ± 0.24° vs 2.90 ± 0.18°; P = .0007). Torsional stiffness was also significantly lower in the PFNA + MCW group than in the PFNA group (0.48 ± 0.0529 vs 0.59 ± 0.0850 N·m/°; P = .045). The maximum failure load was numerically higher in the PFNA + MCW group than in the PFNA group (571.26 ± 92.75 N vs 510.34 ± 76.59 N), although the difference was not statistically significant ( P = .291). In this small biomechanical model study, PFNA combined with modified candy-package wiring reduced torsional displacement and showed favorable trends in axial load-bearing performance compared with PFNA alone. Because several outcomes were not statistically significant and only 5 models were included per group, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary biomechanical evidence rather than proof of superiority. Larger biomechanical studies and clinical validation are required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000050596
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomechanical comparison of PFNA combined with the modified candy-package wiring technique versus PFNA alone in complex unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures

Qiong Chen, Jiaqi Wang, Rongrong Chi, Xiaan Chen et al.
Medicine
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

Biomechanical comparison of PFNA combined with the modified candy-package wiring technique versus PFNA alone in complex unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures

Qiong Chen, Jiaqi Wang, Rongrong Chi, Xiaan Chen, Hansong Wu, Xiangu Li, Suqi Wu
article en

Abstract

Proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) may not provide sufficient control of unstable fracture fragments in complex intertrochanteric fractures. The modified candy-package wiring technique may supplement PFNA by improving resistance to rotational and shear displacement. This biomechanical model study compared PFNA combined with modified candy-package wiring with PFNA alone in an Evans type III intertrochanteric fracture model. Ten standardized femoral fracture models were randomly allocated to a PFNA group (n = 5) or a PFNA plus modified candy-package wiring group (PFNA + MCW group; n = 5). Torsional and axial compression tests were performed. Three repeated loading cycles were conducted for each specimen as conditioning cycles; the prespecified third cycle was used for analysis. Torsional stiffness was calculated as the change in torque divided by the corresponding change in angular displacement (Kt = Δ T /Δ θ ). The mean torsional angle was significantly lower in the PFNA + MCW group than in the PFNA group (2.09 ± 0.24° vs 2.90 ± 0.18°; P = .0007). Torsional stiffness was also significantly lower in the PFNA + MCW group than in the PFNA group (0.48 ± 0.0529 vs 0.59 ± 0.0850 N·m/°; P = .045). The maximum failure load was numerically higher in the PFNA + MCW group than in the PFNA group (571.26 ± 92.75 N vs 510.34 ± 76.59 N), although the difference was not statistically significant ( P = .291). In this small biomechanical model study, PFNA combined with modified candy-package wiring reduced torsional displacement and showed favorable trends in axial load-bearing performance compared with PFNA alone. Because several outcomes were not statistically significant and only 5 models were included per group, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary biomechanical evidence rather than proof of superiority. Larger biomechanical studies and clinical validation are required.

MedicineVol. 105(37)
Jining Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital (CN), Zhejiang Medicine (China) (CN), Hangzhou Medical College (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.