Global drought shows no detectable recent acceleration under climate warming

Recent studies suggest that warming is accelerating continental drought, but these conclusions rely on drought indices using Penman-type potential evapotranspiration (PET). While Penman-type PET is widely used and may suit non-water-limited or irrigated surfaces, it can overstate evaporative demand at broader spatial scales by neglecting land-atmosphere coupling constraints; energy-based PET formulations can address this limitation. Applying multiple PET formulations to calculate the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) over 1981–2024, we show that Penman-type methods artificially inflate PET contributions to SPEI trends, resulting in drying trends at least six times stronger than energy-based SPEIs across drought severity, frequency, and duration. We find no significant acceleration of drought trends across ~99% of quasi-global land area under either PET type. This finding remains robust across centennial timescales (1901– or 1950–2024). Reported drought acceleration therefore largely reflects unconstrained PET methods and imprecise analytical frameworks, rather than a true ecohydrological response to warming, with important implications for climate risk assessment and adaptation planning. No statistically significant acceleration in drought is detected across ~99% of quasi-global land area, according to a study that applied multiple Penman-type and energy-based potential evapotranspiration formulations to Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index records from 1981–2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03954-6
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global drought shows no detectable recent acceleration under climate warming

Jian Yang, Kaighin A. McColl, Alexis Berg, Zhaoyu Dong et al.
Communications Earth & Environment
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
article

Global drought shows no detectable recent acceleration under climate warming

Jian Yang, Kaighin A. McColl, Alexis Berg, Zhaoyu Dong, Yuanchao Fan, Sha Zhou, Jiameng Xu, Yuanyuan Luo, Xiao Zhang
article en

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that warming is accelerating continental drought, but these conclusions rely on drought indices using Penman-type potential evapotranspiration (PET). While Penman-type PET is widely used and may suit non-water-limited or irrigated surfaces, it can overstate evaporative demand at broader spatial scales by neglecting land-atmosphere coupling constraints; energy-based PET formulations can address this limitation. Applying multiple PET formulations to calculate the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) over 1981–2024, we show that Penman-type methods artificially inflate PET contributions to SPEI trends, resulting in drying trends at least six times stronger than energy-based SPEIs across drought severity, frequency, and duration. We find no significant acceleration of drought trends across ~99% of quasi-global land area under either PET type. This finding remains robust across centennial timescales (1901– or 1950–2024). Reported drought acceleration therefore largely reflects unconstrained PET methods and imprecise analytical frameworks, rather than a true ecohydrological response to warming, with important implications for climate risk assessment and adaptation planning. No statistically significant acceleration in drought is detected across ~99% of quasi-global land area, according to a study that applied multiple Penman-type and energy-based potential evapotranspiration formulations to Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index records from 1981–2024.

Communications Earth & EnvironmentVol. 7(1)
Planetary Science Institute (US), Harvard University (US), University of Kentucky (US), Beijing Normal University (CN), Key Laboratory of Guangdong Province (CN), Tsinghua–Berkeley Shenzhen Institute (CN), Université de Montréal (CA), Tsinghua University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.