A composite tool for predicting gestational diabetes or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: development and temporal validation

AIMS: Cardiometabolic pregnancy complications, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), share similar risk factors and increase cardiometabolic risk in women. Medical/lifestyle management reduces their risk but requires early identification of high risk individuals. This study aimed to develop a risk prediction model identifying women at high risk of developing GDM and/or HDP. METHODS: A composite prognostic risk prediction model for developing GDM and/or HDP comprising first trimester sociodemographic and clinical variables was developed using routinely collected health data from women delivering singleton pregnancies in Australia from 2016 to 2022. Variables comprised age; ethnicity; height; body mass index; parity; family history of diabetes; history of GDM, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, chronic hypertension, polycystic ovary syndrome, chronic kidney disease and fetal macrosomia. Model development used logistic regression with performance evaluated using discrimination, calibration, bootstrapped internal and temporal validations, recalibration of intercept and slopes and decision curve analyses. RESULTS: GDM/HDP prevalence was 25.4% (n = 48,502). On temporal validation (n = 12,868), the model had a C-statistic of 0.739 (95% CI: 0.727, 0.738). Following recalibration, the calibration-in-the-large was -0.001 (95%CI: -0.04, 0.04) and the calibration slope was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.05)]. On decision curve analysis, the model outperformed both treat-all and treat-none strategies across threshold probabilities from 8 to 72%. CONCLUSION: The model demonstrated fair-good discrimination and excellent calibration. Decision curve analysis indicated potential clinical utility across a range of threshold probabilities for identifying women at high risk. External validation is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2026.111932
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A composite tool for predicting gestational diabetes or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: development and temporal validation

Lisa Moran, Helena Jane Teede, Aya Mousa, Joanne Enticott et al.
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

A composite tool for predicting gestational diabetes or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: development and temporal validation

Lisa Moran, Helena Jane Teede, Aya Mousa, Joanne Enticott, K.R. Palmer, C.T. Tay, D. L. Rolnik, B.W. Mol, S. Dawadi, R.R. Dhungana, R. Wang, R. Goldstein
article en

Abstract

AIMS: Cardiometabolic pregnancy complications, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), share similar risk factors and increase cardiometabolic risk in women. Medical/lifestyle management reduces their risk but requires early identification of high risk individuals. This study aimed to develop a risk prediction model identifying women at high risk of developing GDM and/or HDP. METHODS: A composite prognostic risk prediction model for developing GDM and/or HDP comprising first trimester sociodemographic and clinical variables was developed using routinely collected health data from women delivering singleton pregnancies in Australia from 2016 to 2022. Variables comprised age; ethnicity; height; body mass index; parity; family history of diabetes; history of GDM, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, chronic hypertension, polycystic ovary syndrome, chronic kidney disease and fetal macrosomia. Model development used logistic regression with performance evaluated using discrimination, calibration, bootstrapped internal and temporal validations, recalibration of intercept and slopes and decision curve analyses. RESULTS: GDM/HDP prevalence was 25.4% (n = 48,502). On temporal validation (n = 12,868), the model had a C-statistic of 0.739 (95% CI: 0.727, 0.738). Following recalibration, the calibration-in-the-large was -0.001 (95%CI: -0.04, 0.04) and the calibration slope was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.05)]. On decision curve analysis, the model outperformed both treat-all and treat-none strategies across threshold probabilities from 8 to 72%. CONCLUSION: The model demonstrated fair-good discrimination and excellent calibration. Decision curve analysis indicated potential clinical utility across a range of threshold probabilities for identifying women at high risk. External validation is required.

Computers in Biology and MedicineVol. 215
The University of Sydney (AU), Monash Medical Centre (AU), Hudson Institute of Medical Research (AU), Monash Health (AU), National Health and Medical Research Council (AU), Monash University (AU)
Veski, National Heart Foundation of Australia, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.