Scientific Isolation? The Consequences of Trump's China Initiative on Chinese Research

ABSTRACT The 2018 China Initiative by the Trump administration complicated procedures and reduced funding for U.S.‐China research collaborations. Using Scopus data, we analyze its impact on Chinese research. We find that it significantly lowered the quality of both publications and co‐authors of Chinese researchers with prior U.S. collaborations compared to those with prior European collaborations, and reduced yearly citations for affected researchers by 6%. The effect was stronger for high‐productivity Chinese researchers in U.S.‐dominated fields. While China is at the forefront of the scientific frontier, it still depends more on the U.S. than the reverse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Economic Review
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.70107
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scientific Isolation? The Consequences of Trump's China Initiative on Chinese Research

David Strömberg, Philippe Aghion, Luc Paluskiewicz, Raphaël Wargon et al.
International Economic Review
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Scientific Isolation? The Consequences of Trump's China Initiative on Chinese Research

David Strömberg, Philippe Aghion, Luc Paluskiewicz, Raphaël Wargon, Karolina Westin, Xueping Sun, Céline Antonin
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The 2018 China Initiative by the Trump administration complicated procedures and reduced funding for U.S.‐China research collaborations. Using Scopus data, we analyze its impact on Chinese research. We find that it significantly lowered the quality of both publications and co‐authors of Chinese researchers with prior U.S. collaborations compared to those with prior European collaborations, and reduced yearly citations for affected researchers by 6%. The effect was stronger for high‐productivity Chinese researchers in U.S.‐dominated fields. While China is at the forefront of the scientific frontier, it still depends more on the U.S. than the reverse.

International Economic Review
INSEAD (FR), Stockholm University (SE), Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris (FR), Paris School of Economics (FR), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.