Impact of Fostemsavir in Individuals with Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1, Stratified by Baseline Viral Load

In populations with undetectable or low viral load (VL) and limited treatment options, antiretrovirals with a new mechanism of action may support HIV-1 treatment success. We evaluated efficacy and safety of fostemsavir-based regimens in participants with limited treatment options and an undetectable or low baseline VL from the phase 3 BRIGHTE study. BRIGHTE included adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 on failing regimens with ≤ 2 fully active antiretrovirals remaining. Participants with 1–2 fully active antiretrovirals entered the randomized cohort and received open-label fostemsavir + optimized background therapy after an 8-day placebo-controlled period. This post hoc analysis assessed virologic suppression (VL < 40 copies/mL; missing = excluded), immunologic outcomes, and safety through week 240 by baseline VL (< 40, 40 to < 400, 400 to < 1000, and ≥ 1000 copies/mL). In the randomized cohort ( N = 272), 21 (8%) participants had baseline VL < 400 copies/mL, 2 with < 40 copies/mL. By week 24, 13/18 (72%), 8/10 (80%), and 121/219 (55%) participants in the < 400, 400 to < 1000, and ≥ 1000 copies/mL subgroups, respectively, had virologic suppression. At week 240, 14/14 (100%) participants with baseline VL < 400 copies/mL were suppressed. In the overall randomized cohort, CD4 + T cell count ( P < 0.001) and CD4 + /CD8 + ratio ( P < 0.001) demonstrated a significant increase from baseline through week 240. Mean change from baseline to week 240 in CD4 + T cell count was + 294 and + 141 cells/mm 3 in the < 40 and 40 to < 400 copies/mL subgroups, respectively. Mean CD4 + /CD8 + ratio was 0.62 at baseline and 0.79 at week 240 in the < 40 copies/mL subgroup and 0.34 at baseline and 0.62 at week 240 in the 40 to < 400 copies/mL subgroup. Few adverse events leading to withdrawal/discontinuation were observed in the < 40 copies/mL (0/2) or 40 to < 400 copies/mL (1/19 [5%]) subgroups. Findings support considering fostemsavir for regimen optimization in individuals with limited treatment options and undetectable/low VL, especially if safety/tolerability may be a concern. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02362503.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-026-01343-2
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Impact of Fostemsavir in Individuals with Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1, Stratified by Baseline Viral Load

Marcia Wang, Bo Li, Bryn Jones, Manyu Prakash et al.
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
article

Impact of Fostemsavir in Individuals with Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1, Stratified by Baseline Viral Load

Marcia Wang, Bo Li, Bryn Jones, Manyu Prakash, Fangfang Du, Bruce Gilliam, Michelle Moorhouse, Alftan Dyson
article en

Abstract

In populations with undetectable or low viral load (VL) and limited treatment options, antiretrovirals with a new mechanism of action may support HIV-1 treatment success. We evaluated efficacy and safety of fostemsavir-based regimens in participants with limited treatment options and an undetectable or low baseline VL from the phase 3 BRIGHTE study. BRIGHTE included adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 on failing regimens with ≤ 2 fully active antiretrovirals remaining. Participants with 1–2 fully active antiretrovirals entered the randomized cohort and received open-label fostemsavir + optimized background therapy after an 8-day placebo-controlled period. This post hoc analysis assessed virologic suppression (VL < 40 copies/mL; missing = excluded), immunologic outcomes, and safety through week 240 by baseline VL (< 40, 40 to < 400, 400 to < 1000, and ≥ 1000 copies/mL). In the randomized cohort ( N = 272), 21 (8%) participants had baseline VL < 400 copies/mL, 2 with < 40 copies/mL. By week 24, 13/18 (72%), 8/10 (80%), and 121/219 (55%) participants in the < 400, 400 to < 1000, and ≥ 1000 copies/mL subgroups, respectively, had virologic suppression. At week 240, 14/14 (100%) participants with baseline VL < 400 copies/mL were suppressed. In the overall randomized cohort, CD4 + T cell count ( P < 0.001) and CD4 + /CD8 + ratio ( P < 0.001) demonstrated a significant increase from baseline through week 240. Mean change from baseline to week 240 in CD4 + T cell count was + 294 and + 141 cells/mm 3 in the < 40 and 40 to < 400 copies/mL subgroups, respectively. Mean CD4 + /CD8 + ratio was 0.62 at baseline and 0.79 at week 240 in the < 40 copies/mL subgroup and 0.34 at baseline and 0.62 at week 240 in the 40 to < 400 copies/mL subgroup. Few adverse events leading to withdrawal/discontinuation were observed in the < 40 copies/mL (0/2) or 40 to < 400 copies/mL (1/19 [5%]) subgroups. Findings support considering fostemsavir for regimen optimization in individuals with limited treatment options and undetectable/low VL, especially if safety/tolerability may be a concern. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02362503.

Infectious Diseases and Therapy
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), South College (US), ViiV Healthcare (United Kingdom) (GB)
ViiV Healthcare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.