Comparison of a Smartphone-Based Method for Measuring Anterior Chamber Depth with Anterior Segment OCT and Smith’s Technique

Background: Measurement of anterior chamber depth (ACD) is an important screening method for angle-closure glaucoma risk. We aimed to determine the precision and agreement of a smartphone-based method for measuring ACD when compared with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and Smith’s technique. Methods: A total of 43 participants (22 female, 21 male) were recruited. The mean age ± standard deviation of participants was 21.9 ± 2.1 years (range = 19–27 years). Three measurements were taken on each participant’s right eye in a random order for each technique. For this comparative study, differences in ACD, test–retest variability of a given method, and Bland–Altman level of agreement were computed to compare differences in performance between all three methods. Results: Smith’s technique over-estimated ACD, while smartphone photography under-estimated ACD, when compared to the reference AS-OCT. There was proportional bias between all three techniques. Smith’s technique had the largest degree of variability, whereas there was no statistically significant difference in test–retest variability between AS-OCT and smartphone photography. Conclusions: Zamir’s smartphone photography technique could be used for measuring ACD. Although there are some limitations compared to other established approaches, smartphone photography may have potential as a low-cost screening tool for estimating ACD in settings where specialised equipment is not available. Further studies are required to establish diagnostic performance for angle-closure screening in clinically relevant populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15187048
Primary Topic
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparison of a Smartphone-Based Method for Measuring Anterior Chamber Depth with Anterior Segment OCT and Smith’s Technique

Heather R.M. Connor, Luke Chong, Amanda Edgar, Cameron Skinner et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
article

Comparison of a Smartphone-Based Method for Measuring Anterior Chamber Depth with Anterior Segment OCT and Smith’s Technique

Heather R.M. Connor, Luke Chong, Amanda Edgar, Cameron Skinner, Monica Hanna, Jessica Xu, Madi Pollock, Minh Luu, Sarah Mawdsley, Jessie Whiley, Monique Jankovski, Brooke Daws, Kingsley Chung
article en

Abstract

Background: Measurement of anterior chamber depth (ACD) is an important screening method for angle-closure glaucoma risk. We aimed to determine the precision and agreement of a smartphone-based method for measuring ACD when compared with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and Smith’s technique. Methods: A total of 43 participants (22 female, 21 male) were recruited. The mean age ± standard deviation of participants was 21.9 ± 2.1 years (range = 19–27 years). Three measurements were taken on each participant’s right eye in a random order for each technique. For this comparative study, differences in ACD, test–retest variability of a given method, and Bland–Altman level of agreement were computed to compare differences in performance between all three methods. Results: Smith’s technique over-estimated ACD, while smartphone photography under-estimated ACD, when compared to the reference AS-OCT. There was proportional bias between all three techniques. Smith’s technique had the largest degree of variability, whereas there was no statistically significant difference in test–retest variability between AS-OCT and smartphone photography. Conclusions: Zamir’s smartphone photography technique could be used for measuring ACD. Although there are some limitations compared to other established approaches, smartphone photography may have potential as a low-cost screening tool for estimating ACD in settings where specialised equipment is not available. Further studies are required to establish diagnostic performance for angle-closure screening in clinically relevant populations.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(18)
Deakin University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.