The evaluation of a digital health kiosk on health care delivery in rural China: embedded mixed-methods cluster randomized controlled trial

Rural primary health care (PHC) in China faces persistent challenges, including limited workforce capacity, fragmented information systems, and patient distrust of village-level care. Although digital health may strengthen PHC delivery, evidence on effective implementation strategies remains limited. We evaluated the effects of a multicomponent provider-to-provider digital health kiosk program including telemedicine platform access, training, demand-side marketing, and monetary incentives on provider engagement, primary care utilization, and clinic income. We conducted an embedded mixed-methods cluster randomized controlled trial from 2021 to 2023. Quantitative data included administrative platform records and surveys. 141 village clinics and doctors were enrolled, with 128 (90.8%) completing follow-up. Villages were randomized into 1 control and 4 intervention groups. Village doctors received (1) general clinical training only (control), (2) telemedicine access and training, (3) telemedicine plus demand-side marketing, (4) telemedicine plus monetary incentives, or (5) telemedicine plus both marketing and incentives. Village doctors used the kiosk to create patient profiles and contact upper-level hospital physicians through one-click or referral consultations. Primary outcomes were telemedicine usage, primary care utilization, and clinic revenue. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 village doctors. Among intervention groups, 81.9% of doctors logged into the platform, but only 14.9% conducted one-click consultations. Combined marketing and incentives marginally increased logins (ATE = 0.71; 95% CI: -0.02, 1.44; p = 0.056) and file creation (ATE = 3.15; 95% CI: -0.47, 6.77; p = 0.088) but did not increase consultations. Marketing alone (ATE = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.03,0.76; p = 0.033) and combined interventions (ATE = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.28, 1.17; p = 0.001) improved primary care utilization. Net medical income increased with marketing (ATE = 12.63; 95% CI: 1.83, 23.43; p = 0.022), incentives (ATE = 12.53; 95% CI: 3.17, 21.90; p = 0.009), and combined interventions (ATE = 12.91; 95% CI: 6.32, 19.49; p < 0.001). Qualitative findings highlighted mistrust of online care and preference for instant messaging as an alternative platform. Marketing and monetary incentives improved utilization and income but did not sustain telemedicine consultations. Trust and integration with social networks are essential for sustained adoption in rural settings. ChiCTR2100053872.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medicine
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-026-05155-6
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The evaluation of a digital health kiosk on health care delivery in rural China: embedded mixed-methods cluster randomized controlled trial

Xiaodong Dong, Qiru Zhou, Hao Xue, Weibin Cheng et al.
BMC Medicine
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

The evaluation of a digital health kiosk on health care delivery in rural China: embedded mixed-methods cluster randomized controlled trial

Xiaodong Dong, Qiru Zhou, Hao Xue, Weibin Cheng, Fengshi Jing, Zhongzhi Xu, Yumeng Du, Junzhang Tian, Sam Hoelzer, Zhang Zhang, Sean Sylvia, Xiaochen Ma, Winne Yip, Yewei Xie, Dan Wu, Yicong Liu, Weiming Tang
article en

Abstract

Rural primary health care (PHC) in China faces persistent challenges, including limited workforce capacity, fragmented information systems, and patient distrust of village-level care. Although digital health may strengthen PHC delivery, evidence on effective implementation strategies remains limited. We evaluated the effects of a multicomponent provider-to-provider digital health kiosk program including telemedicine platform access, training, demand-side marketing, and monetary incentives on provider engagement, primary care utilization, and clinic income. We conducted an embedded mixed-methods cluster randomized controlled trial from 2021 to 2023. Quantitative data included administrative platform records and surveys. 141 village clinics and doctors were enrolled, with 128 (90.8%) completing follow-up. Villages were randomized into 1 control and 4 intervention groups. Village doctors received (1) general clinical training only (control), (2) telemedicine access and training, (3) telemedicine plus demand-side marketing, (4) telemedicine plus monetary incentives, or (5) telemedicine plus both marketing and incentives. Village doctors used the kiosk to create patient profiles and contact upper-level hospital physicians through one-click or referral consultations. Primary outcomes were telemedicine usage, primary care utilization, and clinic revenue. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 village doctors. Among intervention groups, 81.9% of doctors logged into the platform, but only 14.9% conducted one-click consultations. Combined marketing and incentives marginally increased logins (ATE = 0.71; 95% CI: -0.02, 1.44; p = 0.056) and file creation (ATE = 3.15; 95% CI: -0.47, 6.77; p = 0.088) but did not increase consultations. Marketing alone (ATE = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.03,0.76; p = 0.033) and combined interventions (ATE = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.28, 1.17; p = 0.001) improved primary care utilization. Net medical income increased with marketing (ATE = 12.63; 95% CI: 1.83, 23.43; p = 0.022), incentives (ATE = 12.53; 95% CI: 3.17, 21.90; p = 0.009), and combined interventions (ATE = 12.91; 95% CI: 6.32, 19.49; p < 0.001). Qualitative findings highlighted mistrust of online care and preference for instant messaging as an alternative platform. Marketing and monetary incentives improved utilization and income but did not sustain telemedicine consultations. Trust and integration with social networks are essential for sustained adoption in rural settings. ChiCTR2100053872.

BMC Medicine
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Harvard University (US), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Jinan University (CN), Peking University (CN), Washington University in St. Louis (US), SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre (SG), Second Hospital of Shandong University (CN), Duke-NUS Medical School (SG), Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Harvard Global Health Institute (US), First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University (CN), City University of Macau (MO), Aino University (JP), Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.