Parent-reported socialization of lie-telling within the sibling relationship

The present study examined the association between parents’ reported socialization of lie-telling and children’s antisocial and prosocial lie-telling to and for their siblings. Parents (N = 363; 63% female; with at least two children ages 5–12) completed an online survey reporting on their socialization of lie-telling (i.e. encouragement of honesty, punishment of lie-telling, direct instructions and modeling) and their children’s antisocial and prosocial lie-telling within the sibling relationship (Mage gap = 2.59 years; 51% mixed-gender pairings). Results indicated that more frequent punishment of lie-telling and instructions to tell antisocial lies were associated with higher rates of antisocial lie-telling in the sibling relationship. Additionally, more instructions and modeling of prosocial lie-telling were associated with more prosocial lie-telling, and greater encouragement of honesty was associated with less prosocial lie-telling in relation to siblings. The findings suggest that parents’ reported socialization of lie-telling plays an important role in children’s lie-telling within their sibling relationships. Considering the distinct social functions and levels of social approval of antisocial and prosocial lies, these findings also highlight the importance of tailoring socialization strategies to the specific form of dishonesty being addressed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Moral Education
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2026.2720655
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parent-reported socialization of lie-telling within the sibling relationship

Lindsay C. Malloy, Angela D. Evans, Daniella Filoso, Tabeer Afzal
Journal of Moral Education
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

Parent-reported socialization of lie-telling within the sibling relationship

Lindsay C. Malloy, Angela D. Evans, Daniella Filoso, Tabeer Afzal
article en

Abstract

The present study examined the association between parents’ reported socialization of lie-telling and children’s antisocial and prosocial lie-telling to and for their siblings. Parents (N = 363; 63% female; with at least two children ages 5–12) completed an online survey reporting on their socialization of lie-telling (i.e. encouragement of honesty, punishment of lie-telling, direct instructions and modeling) and their children’s antisocial and prosocial lie-telling within the sibling relationship (Mage gap = 2.59 years; 51% mixed-gender pairings). Results indicated that more frequent punishment of lie-telling and instructions to tell antisocial lies were associated with higher rates of antisocial lie-telling in the sibling relationship. Additionally, more instructions and modeling of prosocial lie-telling were associated with more prosocial lie-telling, and greater encouragement of honesty was associated with less prosocial lie-telling in relation to siblings. The findings suggest that parents’ reported socialization of lie-telling plays an important role in children’s lie-telling within their sibling relationships. Considering the distinct social functions and levels of social approval of antisocial and prosocial lies, these findings also highlight the importance of tailoring socialization strategies to the specific form of dishonesty being addressed.

Journal of Moral Education
Brock University (CA), Ontario Tech University (CA), Abiola Ajimobi Technical University Ibadan (NG)
American Psychology-Law Society, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.