The First-Exposure Effect in Social Programs: Evidence Against a Welfare Trap

We develop a framework for estimating a first-exposure effect (FEE) in a social program, defined as the difference between observed use and the counterfactual use absent any learning from first exposure. In administrative data, those never exposed are unobserved, so the counterfactual distribution must be recovered structurally. Under (i) no state dependence in the counterfactual and (ii) behavioural change only at first use, the observed distribution is a one-altered version of the counterfactual. We derive FEE and marginal FEEs for common count processes, provide an R package fee for estimation, and illustrate with Ontario social assistance data. Results show a 12% reduction in unemployment spells due to first exposure, rejecting the welfare trap hypothesis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Econometrics
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics14030045
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The First-Exposure Effect in Social Programs: Evidence Against a Welfare Trap

Wayne Simpson, Umut Oguzoglu, Ryan T. Godwin
Econometrics
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

The First-Exposure Effect in Social Programs: Evidence Against a Welfare Trap

Wayne Simpson, Umut Oguzoglu, Ryan T. Godwin
article en

Abstract

We develop a framework for estimating a first-exposure effect (FEE) in a social program, defined as the difference between observed use and the counterfactual use absent any learning from first exposure. In administrative data, those never exposed are unobserved, so the counterfactual distribution must be recovered structurally. Under (i) no state dependence in the counterfactual and (ii) behavioural change only at first use, the observed distribution is a one-altered version of the counterfactual. We derive FEE and marginal FEEs for common count processes, provide an R package fee for estimation, and illustrate with Ontario social assistance data. Results show a 12% reduction in unemployment spells due to first exposure, rejecting the welfare trap hypothesis.

EconometricsVol. 14(3)
University of Manitoba (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.