StrataXRT Versus Mepitel Film for Prevention of Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: A Pooled Analysis of Intra‐Patient Randomised Trials

INTRODUCTION: We report a pooled analysis of two multicentre intra-patient randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the silicone-based dressings Mepitel Film and StrataXRT for the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) in postmastectomy radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: Each irradiated chest wall was divided into medial and lateral halves, randomised to one dressing each. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 2 or 3 ARD. Secondary endpoints included grade 3 ARD, moist desquamation, time to moist desquamation, Radiation-Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale (RISRAS) scores, adverse events, and treatment preferences. Discordant-pair methods, conditional logistic regression, paired comparisons of area under the curve (AUC), and longitudinal fixed-effects regression were used. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients (median age, 60 years; interquartile range, 51-69) were included (Australia, n = 40; New Zealand, n = 80); 64.2% received moderately hypofractionated or ultrahypofractionated RT. Among 38 discordant pairs, grade 2 or 3 ARD occurred only on the StrataXRT side in 30 patients and only on the Mepitel Film side in eight patients (odds ratio 3.75, 95% CI 1.72-8.18; p = 0.001). Grade 3 ARD and moist desquamation did not differ significantly. HCP-assessed RISRAS AUCs for erythema (p < 0.001) and moist desquamation (p = 0.034) were significantly lower with Mepitel Film, consistent with the longitudinal analyses. Patient-reported RISRAS AUCs did not differ between treatments. Treatment preferences were broadly balanced. CONCLUSIONS: Mepitel Film reduced the incidence of grade 2 or 3 ARD and cumulative HCP-assessed erythema and moist desquamation burden compared with StrataXRT, while patient-reported symptom burden was similar. Selection of a prophylactic dressing for postmastectomy RT should consider patient preference, cost, ease of application, skin sensitivity, and available resources. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12621000124831 and ACTRN12619001477112.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.70117
Primary Topic
Effects of Radiation Exposure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

StrataXRT Versus Mepitel Film for Prevention of Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: A Pooled Analysis of Intra‐Patient Randomised Trials

Carminia Lapuz, Farshad Foroudi, Michael Chao, Patries M. Herst et al.
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Effects of Radiation Exposure
article

StrataXRT Versus Mepitel Film for Prevention of Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: A Pooled Analysis of Intra‐Patient Randomised Trials

Carminia Lapuz, Farshad Foroudi, Michael Chao, Patries M. Herst, Pui Lam Yip, Shing Fung Lee, Melissa James
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We report a pooled analysis of two multicentre intra-patient randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the silicone-based dressings Mepitel Film and StrataXRT for the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) in postmastectomy radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: Each irradiated chest wall was divided into medial and lateral halves, randomised to one dressing each. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 2 or 3 ARD. Secondary endpoints included grade 3 ARD, moist desquamation, time to moist desquamation, Radiation-Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale (RISRAS) scores, adverse events, and treatment preferences. Discordant-pair methods, conditional logistic regression, paired comparisons of area under the curve (AUC), and longitudinal fixed-effects regression were used. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients (median age, 60 years; interquartile range, 51-69) were included (Australia, n = 40; New Zealand, n = 80); 64.2% received moderately hypofractionated or ultrahypofractionated RT. Among 38 discordant pairs, grade 2 or 3 ARD occurred only on the StrataXRT side in 30 patients and only on the Mepitel Film side in eight patients (odds ratio 3.75, 95% CI 1.72-8.18; p = 0.001). Grade 3 ARD and moist desquamation did not differ significantly. HCP-assessed RISRAS AUCs for erythema (p < 0.001) and moist desquamation (p = 0.034) were significantly lower with Mepitel Film, consistent with the longitudinal analyses. Patient-reported RISRAS AUCs did not differ between treatments. Treatment preferences were broadly balanced. CONCLUSIONS: Mepitel Film reduced the incidence of grade 2 or 3 ARD and cumulative HCP-assessed erythema and moist desquamation burden compared with StrataXRT, while patient-reported symptom burden was similar. Selection of a prophylactic dressing for postmastectomy RT should consider patient preference, cost, ease of application, skin sensitivity, and available resources. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12621000124831 and ACTRN12619001477112.

Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
The University of Melbourne (AU), National University of Singapore (SG), Hollywood Private Hospital (AU), Christchurch Hospital (NZ), National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (SG), National University Hospital (SG), Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre (AU), Monash University (AU), University of Otago (NZ)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Effects of Radiation Exposure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.