Identification of high-impact chronic pain among cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study using the Graded Chronic Pain Scale framework

Abstract Purpose Chronic cancer-related pain is a prevalent and often under-recognized issue among individuals living with or after cancer. Clinically useful tools are needed to classify pain severity and impact and to identify those requiring targeted support. This study applied the Graded Chronic Pain Scale–Revised (GCPS-R) in a cohort of cancer survivors and examined differences in pain characteristics and psychosocial factors across GCPS-R subgroups. Secondly, the study compared pain characteristics in cancer survivors with high-impact chronic pain (HICP) to an age- and sex-matched sample of patients with non-cancer HICP. Methods Patients attending a residential cancer rehabilitation course completed a screening questionnaire and a pain-specific module including the GCPS-R and validated measures of disability, psychological distress, pain catastrophizing, and self-rated health. Cancer survivors with HICP were matched 1:3 to patients with non-cancer HICP using registry data collected prior to their initial consultation at an interdisciplinary Pain Center. Results Among 270 cancer survivors included in the analysis, 61% were classified as having HICP. Increasing GCPS-R impact levels were associated with greater pain intensity and disability, higher psychological distress and pain catastrophizing, and poorer self-rated health and quality of life ( p < 0.05). Compared with matched non-cancer patients with HICP, cancer survivors reported lower pain intensity and catastrophizing but were at least as likely to meet criteria for widespread pain. Conclusion HICP is present among cancer survivors seeking rehabilitation. The GCPS-R can differentiate clinically meaningful subgroups and may support systematic assessment of pain severity and impact to identify patients requiring targeted support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-11190-z
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Opioid Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of high-impact chronic pain among cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study using the Graded Chronic Pain Scale framework

Lene Jarlbæk, Caroline Matilde Elnegaard, Henrik Bjarke Vægter, Julie Roed Jespersen
Supportive Care in Cancer
Pain Management and Opioid Use
article

Identification of high-impact chronic pain among cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study using the Graded Chronic Pain Scale framework

Lene Jarlbæk, Caroline Matilde Elnegaard, Henrik Bjarke Vægter, Julie Roed Jespersen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Chronic cancer-related pain is a prevalent and often under-recognized issue among individuals living with or after cancer. Clinically useful tools are needed to classify pain severity and impact and to identify those requiring targeted support. This study applied the Graded Chronic Pain Scale–Revised (GCPS-R) in a cohort of cancer survivors and examined differences in pain characteristics and psychosocial factors across GCPS-R subgroups. Secondly, the study compared pain characteristics in cancer survivors with high-impact chronic pain (HICP) to an age- and sex-matched sample of patients with non-cancer HICP. Methods Patients attending a residential cancer rehabilitation course completed a screening questionnaire and a pain-specific module including the GCPS-R and validated measures of disability, psychological distress, pain catastrophizing, and self-rated health. Cancer survivors with HICP were matched 1:3 to patients with non-cancer HICP using registry data collected prior to their initial consultation at an interdisciplinary Pain Center. Results Among 270 cancer survivors included in the analysis, 61% were classified as having HICP. Increasing GCPS-R impact levels were associated with greater pain intensity and disability, higher psychological distress and pain catastrophizing, and poorer self-rated health and quality of life ( p < 0.05). Compared with matched non-cancer patients with HICP, cancer survivors reported lower pain intensity and catastrophizing but were at least as likely to meet criteria for widespread pain. Conclusion HICP is present among cancer survivors seeking rehabilitation. The GCPS-R can differentiate clinically meaningful subgroups and may support systematic assessment of pain severity and impact to identify patients requiring targeted support.

Supportive Care in CancerVol. 34(10)
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Odense University Hospital (DK)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pain Management and Opioid Use
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.