Exploring AI Teammates’ Initiative in Supporting Teamwork Processes in Human-AI Teams

This study explores the impact of designing AI teammates to support teamwork processes in Human-AI Teams (HATs), comparing reactive and proactive support’s influence on teamwork experiences. HATs achieve shared objectives through taskwork and teamwork processes. Teamwork processes between humans are well documented, such as goal setting, plan development, and coordination. However, it is less clear how AI teammates can be designed to support these processes in HATs. Furthermore, more attention is needed on how initiative levels of the AI teamwork support would impact the HATs dynamics. Two levels of initiative of a Wizard of Oz AI teammate (RoboAnt) were compared in a gamified testbed HiveMind. Reactive RoboAnt responded to teamwork requests when prompted. Proactive RoboAnt initiated and engaged in teamwork processes. The findings show significantly higher counts of teamwork processes with proactive AI across preparation, execution, and evaluation phases and better team performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813261485930
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring AI Teammates’ Initiative in Supporting Teamwork Processes in Human-AI Teams

Michael C. Dorneich, Yvonne A. Farah
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Exploring AI Teammates’ Initiative in Supporting Teamwork Processes in Human-AI Teams

Michael C. Dorneich, Yvonne A. Farah
article en

Abstract

This study explores the impact of designing AI teammates to support teamwork processes in Human-AI Teams (HATs), comparing reactive and proactive support’s influence on teamwork experiences. HATs achieve shared objectives through taskwork and teamwork processes. Teamwork processes between humans are well documented, such as goal setting, plan development, and coordination. However, it is less clear how AI teammates can be designed to support these processes in HATs. Furthermore, more attention is needed on how initiative levels of the AI teamwork support would impact the HATs dynamics. Two levels of initiative of a Wizard of Oz AI teammate (RoboAnt) were compared in a gamified testbed HiveMind. Reactive RoboAnt responded to teamwork requests when prompted. Proactive RoboAnt initiated and engaged in teamwork processes. The findings show significantly higher counts of teamwork processes with proactive AI across preparation, execution, and evaluation phases and better team performance.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Iowa State University (US)
Iowa State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.