Between Materiality and Sanctity: The Social Construction of the Object System in Zhu Xi’s Family Rituals

This article examines how Zhu Xi’s Family Rituals organizes ritual objects into a relational material system. Focusing on ritual vessels, attire, documents, offerings, ancestral tablets, and domestic spaces, it analyzes how their prescribed positions, uses, relations, and trajectories structure ritual practice. Rather than treating these objects as passive accessories or isolated symbols, the article argues that their significance emerges from their coordination with bodies, spaces, kinship positions, and sequences of action. Through this coordination, distinctions of kinship, status, obligation, and ritual role become materially perceptible and practically enforceable. The article further argues that the material organization prescribed in Family Rituals was not merely an expression or representation of Confucian ritual order, but one of the mechanisms through which that order was produced, enacted, and reproduced. By reading these heterogeneous objects as an interconnected system, the study shifts attention from the symbolic meaning of individual things to the material relations that made Confucian ethical and ritual order practicable in domestic life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17091065
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Between Materiality and Sanctity: The Social Construction of the Object System in Zhu Xi’s Family Rituals

Rongming Hu, Na Jiang, Jiangping Liu
Religions
Chinese history and philosophy
article

Between Materiality and Sanctity: The Social Construction of the Object System in Zhu Xi’s Family Rituals

Rongming Hu, Na Jiang, Jiangping Liu
article en

Abstract

This article examines how Zhu Xi’s Family Rituals organizes ritual objects into a relational material system. Focusing on ritual vessels, attire, documents, offerings, ancestral tablets, and domestic spaces, it analyzes how their prescribed positions, uses, relations, and trajectories structure ritual practice. Rather than treating these objects as passive accessories or isolated symbols, the article argues that their significance emerges from their coordination with bodies, spaces, kinship positions, and sequences of action. Through this coordination, distinctions of kinship, status, obligation, and ritual role become materially perceptible and practically enforceable. The article further argues that the material organization prescribed in Family Rituals was not merely an expression or representation of Confucian ritual order, but one of the mechanisms through which that order was produced, enacted, and reproduced. By reading these heterogeneous objects as an interconnected system, the study shifts attention from the symbolic meaning of individual things to the material relations that made Confucian ethical and ritual order practicable in domestic life.

ReligionsVol. 17(9)
Shangrao Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Between Materiality and Sanctity: The Social Construction of the Object System in Zhu Xi’s Family Rituals — Rongming Hu, Na Jiang, et al. · Religions (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS