Nettles in the Nexus: On Wallace on Relational Morality

Abstract Wallace aims to interpret all of morality in relational terms. The paradigmatic features of his relational interpretation derive from the case of promising. I agree both that morality has a rich and interesting relational core and that promises illustrate it well. Against Wallace, however, I argue that other significant elements of morality resist assimilation to his relational interpretation. In some cases, this is because their relational character differs notably from that of promising. In other cases, important elements of morality lack a relational character altogether. Wallace’s interpretation therefore stands to be improved by sharply reducing the scope of its ambition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Philosophy
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2026.10073
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Nettles in the Nexus: On Wallace on Relational Morality

Gopal Sreenivasan
Canadian Journal of Philosophy
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

Nettles in the Nexus: On Wallace on Relational Morality

Gopal Sreenivasan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Wallace aims to interpret all of morality in relational terms. The paradigmatic features of his relational interpretation derive from the case of promising. I agree both that morality has a rich and interesting relational core and that promises illustrate it well. Against Wallace, however, I argue that other significant elements of morality resist assimilation to his relational interpretation. In some cases, this is because their relational character differs notably from that of promising. In other cases, important elements of morality lack a relational character altogether. Wallace’s interpretation therefore stands to be improved by sharply reducing the scope of its ambition.

Canadian Journal of Philosophy
Duke University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.