The “Professional Mortality” Problem in Early City Management: A Study of Organized Denial

ABSTRACT The early city management profession experienced appalling rates of attrition. This problem of “professional mortality” had been clearly recognized by the end of World War I: causes of attrition included threats and violence against managers, intense political interference in managers' work, and interpersonal missteps. Yet the organized management profession and advocates of the manager plan actively ignored threats and were unwilling to respond collectively or officially to political interference; leading scholars recognized but did not publicly discuss common interpersonal problems faced by managers. This silence on the underlying causes of turnover marked an effort to protect the manager plan's viability in the face of growing electoral opposition during the 1920s, placing the interests of the profession above its practicing members. The optimistic, rationalist discourses of advocates, scholars, and professional leaders rested on self‐conscious denial of uncomfortable realities; a full historical accounting may help avoid repeating these mistakes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration Review
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70200
Primary Topic
Management Theory and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The “Professional Mortality” Problem in Early City Management: A Study of Organized Denial

Ben Merriman
Public Administration Review
Management Theory and Practice
article

The “Professional Mortality” Problem in Early City Management: A Study of Organized Denial

Ben Merriman
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The early city management profession experienced appalling rates of attrition. This problem of “professional mortality” had been clearly recognized by the end of World War I: causes of attrition included threats and violence against managers, intense political interference in managers' work, and interpersonal missteps. Yet the organized management profession and advocates of the manager plan actively ignored threats and were unwilling to respond collectively or officially to political interference; leading scholars recognized but did not publicly discuss common interpersonal problems faced by managers. This silence on the underlying causes of turnover marked an effort to protect the manager plan's viability in the face of growing electoral opposition during the 1920s, placing the interests of the profession above its practicing members. The optimistic, rationalist discourses of advocates, scholars, and professional leaders rested on self‐conscious denial of uncomfortable realities; a full historical accounting may help avoid repeating these mistakes.

Public Administration Review
University of Kansas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Management Theory and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.