Weighted Sequential Construction of Goodness-of-Fit Statistics from Pairwise Concordance Marginal Information in Sparse Binary IRT Models with Symmetric Intercepts and Slopes

When many binary items are analyzed, most cells in the complete response table are empty. Full-table statistics may then be unreliable, and an omnibus result does not locate the misfit. This paper develops a local goodness-of-fit testing method for binary item response models by extending the weighted sequential sums-of-squares construction to pairwise concordance margins. The construction gives ordered one-degree-of-freedom components for individual item pairs. They are compared with Cholesky components and four local diagnostics under zero and wide symmetric intercepts. Omnibus statistics are examined separately under symmetric slopes. The sequential components have an empirical Type I error close to the nominal levels. With zero intercepts, all methods show substantial power for the target pairs, although pair order moves some shared discrepancy into non-target components. Cholesky gives higher target-pair power and broader moderate elevations across non-target pairs, whereas the sequential components show more concentrated, order-dependent peaks. With wide symmetric intercepts, power differs greatly among target pairs, and the Lagrange multiplier statistic is particularly sensitive to intercept distance. The main qualitative patterns persist across three nominal levels. Lower-order omnibus statistics generally maintain an empirical Type I error close to the nominal levels and detect the slope alternatives, whereas Pearson–Fisher is liberal in the sparse full table. A symmetric parameter vector therefore need not give uniform local diagnostic results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18091520
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weighted Sequential Construction of Goodness-of-Fit Statistics from Pairwise Concordance Marginal Information in Sparse Binary IRT Models with Symmetric Intercepts and Slopes

Mark Reiser, Jinhui Xu, Runqi Li
Symmetry
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Weighted Sequential Construction of Goodness-of-Fit Statistics from Pairwise Concordance Marginal Information in Sparse Binary IRT Models with Symmetric Intercepts and Slopes

Mark Reiser, Jinhui Xu, Runqi Li
article en

Abstract

When many binary items are analyzed, most cells in the complete response table are empty. Full-table statistics may then be unreliable, and an omnibus result does not locate the misfit. This paper develops a local goodness-of-fit testing method for binary item response models by extending the weighted sequential sums-of-squares construction to pairwise concordance margins. The construction gives ordered one-degree-of-freedom components for individual item pairs. They are compared with Cholesky components and four local diagnostics under zero and wide symmetric intercepts. Omnibus statistics are examined separately under symmetric slopes. The sequential components have an empirical Type I error close to the nominal levels. With zero intercepts, all methods show substantial power for the target pairs, although pair order moves some shared discrepancy into non-target components. Cholesky gives higher target-pair power and broader moderate elevations across non-target pairs, whereas the sequential components show more concentrated, order-dependent peaks. With wide symmetric intercepts, power differs greatly among target pairs, and the Lagrange multiplier statistic is particularly sensitive to intercept distance. The main qualitative patterns persist across three nominal levels. Lower-order omnibus statistics generally maintain an empirical Type I error close to the nominal levels and detect the slope alternatives, whereas Pearson–Fisher is liberal in the sparse full table. A symmetric parameter vector therefore need not give uniform local diagnostic results.

SymmetryVol. 18(9)
Jinan University (CN), Arizona State University (US)
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.