Divergence between physical and emotional heat resilience in Chinese cities

Under increasingly frequent urban heatwaves, public emotional responses do not always align with levels of physical heat exposure, but the relationship between the two remains unclear. Here, using social media and meteorological data, we quantify the mismatch between physical heat exposure and public emotional responses from 2010 to 2024 in China, identify its drivers and project this relationship under different shared socioeconomic pathways. The results show that 84.9% of cities suffered high-intensity emotional shocks, substantially exceeding the 52.1% facing severe physical exposure, with underdeveloped regions showing especially prolonged emotional recovery. Physical resilience is mainly driven by socioeconomic and land-cover factors, while emotional resilience is more sensitive to the intensity and characteristics of heat events. The projections indicate that emotional responses declined about 26% faster than physical heat exposure over 2025–2050. The identified mismatch offers a scientific basis for differentiated heat-action planning to address physical and emotional vulnerabilities. Heatwaves threaten both physical and mental health, yet physical heat exposure and emotional responses often diverge. The study shows that 84.9% of Chinese cities experienced severe emotional shocks, compared with 52.1% facing severe heat exposure, driven by socioeconomic and environmental factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Climate Change
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-026-02732-8
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Divergence between physical and emotional heat resilience in Chinese cities

Mo Wang, Zhangli Hu, Bao‐Jie He, Hui Chen et al.
Nature Climate Change
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Divergence between physical and emotional heat resilience in Chinese cities

Mo Wang, Zhangli Hu, Bao‐Jie He, Hui Chen, Shiqi Zhou, Yixuan Zou, Jiaping Liu, Pan feng, Xiaodong Xu, Weiyi Jia, Haowen Xu, Fangzheng Li, Yongqi Lou, Cong Guo, Zhiqiang Wu
article en

Abstract

Under increasingly frequent urban heatwaves, public emotional responses do not always align with levels of physical heat exposure, but the relationship between the two remains unclear. Here, using social media and meteorological data, we quantify the mismatch between physical heat exposure and public emotional responses from 2010 to 2024 in China, identify its drivers and project this relationship under different shared socioeconomic pathways. The results show that 84.9% of cities suffered high-intensity emotional shocks, substantially exceeding the 52.1% facing severe physical exposure, with underdeveloped regions showing especially prolonged emotional recovery. Physical resilience is mainly driven by socioeconomic and land-cover factors, while emotional resilience is more sensitive to the intensity and characteristics of heat events. The projections indicate that emotional responses declined about 26% faster than physical heat exposure over 2025–2050. The identified mismatch offers a scientific basis for differentiated heat-action planning to address physical and emotional vulnerabilities. Heatwaves threaten both physical and mental health, yet physical heat exposure and emotional responses often diverge. The study shows that 84.9% of Chinese cities experienced severe emotional shocks, compared with 52.1% facing severe heat exposure, driven by socioeconomic and environmental factors.

Nature Climate Change
Tongji University (CN), Chongqing University (CN), Beijing Forestry University (CN), Beijing University of Technology (CN), Guangzhou University (CN), Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute (CN), Guangdong Urban & Rural Planning and Design Institute (CN), Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning and Design Institute (CN), Institute of New Materials (CN), Southeast University (CN), Fuzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.