Moving the quality needle? Provider choice, waiting times and clinical outcomes

Abstract We study the effect of expanding patient choice of healthcare provider on care process and clinical outcomes central to the functioning of a health system, using a quasi‐natural experiment in Spain over 2002–2019. Exploiting the staggered adoption of provider choice reforms across Spanish regional health services, we estimate heterogeneity‐robust difference‐in‐differences models on region–year panel data alongside individual‐level survey data. We find that the availability of provider choice reduces specialist waiting times by approximately 17 days (19% of the pre‐reform mean) and the use of private specialist visits, without increasing public health spending. The waiting time and private utilization results are robust to excluding the region where the 2009 reform bundled choice with new hospitals, public–private partnerships, and a budget increase. Although we cannot reject zero effects on some clinical outcomes, the evidence is consistent with the thesis that provider choice improves the ‘quality needle’, namely, it improves observable process quality without affecting less‐visible clinical dimensions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economica
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.70079
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moving the quality needle? Provider choice, waiting times and clinical outcomes

Joan Costa‐Font, Juan David Garcia Corchero
Economica
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Moving the quality needle? Provider choice, waiting times and clinical outcomes

Joan Costa‐Font, Juan David Garcia Corchero
article en

Abstract

Abstract We study the effect of expanding patient choice of healthcare provider on care process and clinical outcomes central to the functioning of a health system, using a quasi‐natural experiment in Spain over 2002–2019. Exploiting the staggered adoption of provider choice reforms across Spanish regional health services, we estimate heterogeneity‐robust difference‐in‐differences models on region–year panel data alongside individual‐level survey data. We find that the availability of provider choice reduces specialist waiting times by approximately 17 days (19% of the pre‐reform mean) and the use of private specialist visits, without increasing public health spending. The waiting time and private utilization results are robust to excluding the region where the 2009 reform bundled choice with new hospitals, public–private partnerships, and a budget increase. Although we cannot reject zero effects on some clinical outcomes, the evidence is consistent with the thesis that provider choice improves the ‘quality needle’, namely, it improves observable process quality without affecting less‐visible clinical dimensions.

Economica
Universidad de Málaga (ES), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon