Pediatric Inpatient Continuous Glucose Monitor Accuracy by Sensor Wear Day, Hospital Day, and Glucose Rate of Change

BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves glycemic outcomes but inpatient use in the United States is not FDA approved, despite the potential need for frequent glycemic monitoring during hospitalization. We sought to assess CGM accuracy in the pediatric hospital setting and to evaluate the impact of potential modifiers of accuracy, including sensor wear day, hospitalization day, and glucose changes. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional accuracy study among youth and young adults with diabetes hospitalized at two pediatric centers, reference point-of-care (POC) capillary glucose values were compared with Dexcom G7 CGM glucose readings (paired within 5 min). Accuracy was assessed using standard metrics, including mean absolute relative difference (MARD) and Parkes error grids, overall, and stratified by sensor wear day, hospital day, and CGM glucose rate of change. RESULTS: We analyzed 544 POC-CGM glucose pairs from 68 participants with diabetes aged 2-22 years (mean 12.4 ± 5.8 years old, 58.8% female, 66.2% White, 8.8% Hispanic) during 80 hospital encounters. The overall MARD was 12.5%. Accuracy was comparable on sensor wear day 1 and days 2-6 (MARD 12.3% vs 13.6%, respectively) and was best on wear days 7-10 (MARD 10.6%). Accuracy improved from hospital day 1 (MARD 13.7%) to hospital days 2-4 and 5-30 (MARD 10.4% and 12.5%, respectively). Overall and on wear day 1, almost all glucose pairs (99%) fell within low-risk Parkes error grid zones A and B. Accuracy was best with a flat [-1 to 1 mg/(dL·min)] rate of change (MARD 11.5%-11.9%) and was reduced with rapidly rising or falling [beyond -2 or 2 mg/(dL·min)] CGM values (MARD 16.6%-18.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In this pediatric hospital CGM accuracy study, MARD was within a favorable range of <14% overall and throughout sensor wear and hospitalization. Reduced accuracy with rapidly changing glucose highlights the need to incorporate trend arrows into hospital CGM protocols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156261486139
Primary Topic
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pediatric Inpatient Continuous Glucose Monitor Accuracy by Sensor Wear Day, Hospital Day, and Glucose Rate of Change

Jessica Ruiz, Erin Cobry, Katharine C. Garvey, Bennett Stewart et al.
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
article

Pediatric Inpatient Continuous Glucose Monitor Accuracy by Sensor Wear Day, Hospital Day, and Glucose Rate of Change

Jessica Ruiz, Erin Cobry, Katharine C. Garvey, Bennett Stewart, Emily Jost, Allison S Bernique, Amy B. Stein, Christina M. Astley, Alexander Wheelock
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves glycemic outcomes but inpatient use in the United States is not FDA approved, despite the potential need for frequent glycemic monitoring during hospitalization. We sought to assess CGM accuracy in the pediatric hospital setting and to evaluate the impact of potential modifiers of accuracy, including sensor wear day, hospitalization day, and glucose changes. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional accuracy study among youth and young adults with diabetes hospitalized at two pediatric centers, reference point-of-care (POC) capillary glucose values were compared with Dexcom G7 CGM glucose readings (paired within 5 min). Accuracy was assessed using standard metrics, including mean absolute relative difference (MARD) and Parkes error grids, overall, and stratified by sensor wear day, hospital day, and CGM glucose rate of change. RESULTS: We analyzed 544 POC-CGM glucose pairs from 68 participants with diabetes aged 2-22 years (mean 12.4 ± 5.8 years old, 58.8% female, 66.2% White, 8.8% Hispanic) during 80 hospital encounters. The overall MARD was 12.5%. Accuracy was comparable on sensor wear day 1 and days 2-6 (MARD 12.3% vs 13.6%, respectively) and was best on wear days 7-10 (MARD 10.6%). Accuracy improved from hospital day 1 (MARD 13.7%) to hospital days 2-4 and 5-30 (MARD 10.4% and 12.5%, respectively). Overall and on wear day 1, almost all glucose pairs (99%) fell within low-risk Parkes error grid zones A and B. Accuracy was best with a flat [-1 to 1 mg/(dL·min)] rate of change (MARD 11.5%-11.9%) and was reduced with rapidly rising or falling [beyond -2 or 2 mg/(dL·min)] CGM values (MARD 16.6%-18.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In this pediatric hospital CGM accuracy study, MARD was within a favorable range of <14% overall and throughout sensor wear and hospitalization. Reduced accuracy with rapidly changing glucose highlights the need to incorporate trend arrows into hospital CGM protocols.

Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Broad Institute (US), Boston Children's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.