BIS Versus End-tidal Anaesthetic Gas Concentration-guided General Anaesthesia for Prevention of Intraoperative Awareness in Elective Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Background Awareness during general anaesthesia (GA) is a rare but serious complication, affecting 0.15%–0.2% of patients, with potential psychological consequences such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring, which uses electroencephalography (EEG)-derived metrics to assess anaesthesia depth, has shown promise in reducing intraoperative awareness, though its universal adoption remains limited due to mixed evidence. Purpose This study aimed to compare BIS-guided and end-tidal anaesthetic gas concentration (ETAG)-guided techniques in a randomised controlled trial conducted in India, addressing gaps in existing literature, particularly among Asian populations. Methods A total of 674 patients, aged 18–65 years, undergoing elective surgeries were randomised into two groups: BIS ( n = 341) and ETAG ( n = 333). The assessment of intraoperative awareness in both study groups was conducted using two distinct methods. Two independent interviewers, both blinded to the study conditions, carried out these assessments. The first method involved the modified Brice interview, while the second employed the Michigan Awareness Classification Instrument. Results Awareness incidence was 0.58% in the BIS group and 0.90% in the ETAG group ( p = .63), with no statistically significant differences. Secondary outcomes, including time to eye opening, extubation, hospital stay duration and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), were also comparable. Both methods provided equivalent anaesthetic depth and haemodynamic stability. Conclusion This randomised trial found that neither BIS nor minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) demonstrated superiority in terms of intraoperative awareness. Future research should focus on high-risk populations, explore stringent BIS targets (e.g., BIS <50) and explore the cost-effectiveness of these monitoring techniques in various clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Neurosciences
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531261477576
Primary Topic
Nausea and vomiting management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

BIS Versus End-tidal Anaesthetic Gas Concentration-guided General Anaesthesia for Prevention of Intraoperative Awareness in Elective Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Narender Kaloria, Shiv Lal Soni, Goverdhan Dutt Puri, Venkata Ganesh et al.
Annals of Neurosciences
Nausea and vomiting management
article

BIS Versus End-tidal Anaesthetic Gas Concentration-guided General Anaesthesia for Prevention of Intraoperative Awareness in Elective Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Narender Kaloria, Shiv Lal Soni, Goverdhan Dutt Puri, Venkata Ganesh, Akhilesh Sharma, Kamal Kajal, Kiran Jangra, Shayam Charan Meena, Ajay Singh, Suman Arora, Amitabh Dutta, Nitin Sethi
article en

Abstract

Background Awareness during general anaesthesia (GA) is a rare but serious complication, affecting 0.15%–0.2% of patients, with potential psychological consequences such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring, which uses electroencephalography (EEG)-derived metrics to assess anaesthesia depth, has shown promise in reducing intraoperative awareness, though its universal adoption remains limited due to mixed evidence. Purpose This study aimed to compare BIS-guided and end-tidal anaesthetic gas concentration (ETAG)-guided techniques in a randomised controlled trial conducted in India, addressing gaps in existing literature, particularly among Asian populations. Methods A total of 674 patients, aged 18–65 years, undergoing elective surgeries were randomised into two groups: BIS ( n = 341) and ETAG ( n = 333). The assessment of intraoperative awareness in both study groups was conducted using two distinct methods. Two independent interviewers, both blinded to the study conditions, carried out these assessments. The first method involved the modified Brice interview, while the second employed the Michigan Awareness Classification Instrument. Results Awareness incidence was 0.58% in the BIS group and 0.90% in the ETAG group ( p = .63), with no statistically significant differences. Secondary outcomes, including time to eye opening, extubation, hospital stay duration and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), were also comparable. Both methods provided equivalent anaesthetic depth and haemodynamic stability. Conclusion This randomised trial found that neither BIS nor minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) demonstrated superiority in terms of intraoperative awareness. Future research should focus on high-risk populations, explore stringent BIS targets (e.g., BIS <50) and explore the cost-effectiveness of these monitoring techniques in various clinical settings.

Annals of Neurosciences
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur (IN), Sir Ganga Ram Hospital (IN), Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Nausea and vomiting management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.