Trends in the Cost-Effectiveness of Federal Lifesaving Regulations, 1967–2024: The Triumph of Dr. John Morrall

Abstract Dr. John Morrall was a pioneer in the development of league tables that rank the cost-effectiveness of lifesaving federal regulations. Using Dr. Morrall’s methods, we developed a lifesaving league table for 2009–2024 and compared it to Dr. Morrall’s largest league table, which covered 1967–2001. Although the sample sizes in the two periods are relatively small and, therefore, limit statistically robust comparisons, we report suggestive evidence that the cost-effectiveness of federal lifesaving regulations has improved. The recent data reinforce Morrall’s observation that safety regulations tend to be more cost-effective than health regulations. We also verify a concern of some early critics of lifesaving league tables: as more of the non-lifesaving benefits of federal regulations are included in the ratios, the estimated cost-effectiveness improves. Finally, we describe some practical limitations of using benefit–cost analysis to achieve greater public protections at less cost and recommend that selection of regulatory alternatives be given more emphasis in the conduct of regulatory impact analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2026.10052
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trends in the Cost-Effectiveness of Federal Lifesaving Regulations, 1967–2024: The Triumph of Dr. John Morrall

Keith Belton, John D. Graham
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Trends in the Cost-Effectiveness of Federal Lifesaving Regulations, 1967–2024: The Triumph of Dr. John Morrall

Keith Belton, John D. Graham
article en

Abstract

Abstract Dr. John Morrall was a pioneer in the development of league tables that rank the cost-effectiveness of lifesaving federal regulations. Using Dr. Morrall’s methods, we developed a lifesaving league table for 2009–2024 and compared it to Dr. Morrall’s largest league table, which covered 1967–2001. Although the sample sizes in the two periods are relatively small and, therefore, limit statistically robust comparisons, we report suggestive evidence that the cost-effectiveness of federal lifesaving regulations has improved. The recent data reinforce Morrall’s observation that safety regulations tend to be more cost-effective than health regulations. We also verify a concern of some early critics of lifesaving league tables: as more of the non-lifesaving benefits of federal regulations are included in the ratios, the estimated cost-effectiveness improves. Finally, we describe some practical limitations of using benefit–cost analysis to achieve greater public protections at less cost and recommend that selection of regulatory alternatives be given more emphasis in the conduct of regulatory impact analysis.

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
American Chemistry Council (US), Indiana University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.