Software Fairness Analysis and Repair via Causal Model-Guided Data Mutation

Machine learning (ML) software automates various decision-making processes, significantly enhancing the efficiency of societal operations. However, the widespread adoption of ML software raises growing concerns about fairness, as such software often exhibits biases that disadvantage specific demographic groups or individuals. Since these biases typically stem from correlations between sensitive attributes and label within the training data, disrupting these correlations is a promising direction for fairness repair. Therefore, we introduce Fairabel , a novel approach that repairs fairness by mutating the training data under the guidance of causal models and multi-objective optimization. To evaluate Fairabel, we conduct an extensive empirical comparison against existing approaches across 40 decision-making scenarios. Our experimental results show that Fairabel reduces ML software bias by 50% on average across three fairness metrics, outperforming the state-of-the-art with a 9% relative improvement. Additionally, Fairabel surpasses the state-of-the-art by 1.5% on average across five performance metrics, demonstrating a superior ability to preserve software performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3846174
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Software Fairness Analysis and Repair via Causal Model-Guided Data Mutation

Zhenpeng Chen, Ying Xiao, Yepang Liu, Jie M. Zhang et al.
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Software Fairness Analysis and Repair via Causal Model-Guided Data Mutation

Zhenpeng Chen, Ying Xiao, Yepang Liu, Jie M. Zhang, Mohammad Reza Mousavi
article en

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) software automates various decision-making processes, significantly enhancing the efficiency of societal operations. However, the widespread adoption of ML software raises growing concerns about fairness, as such software often exhibits biases that disadvantage specific demographic groups or individuals. Since these biases typically stem from correlations between sensitive attributes and label within the training data, disrupting these correlations is a promising direction for fairness repair. Therefore, we introduce Fairabel , a novel approach that repairs fairness by mutating the training data under the guidance of causal models and multi-objective optimization. To evaluate Fairabel, we conduct an extensive empirical comparison against existing approaches across 40 decision-making scenarios. Our experimental results show that Fairabel reduces ML software bias by 50% on average across three fairness metrics, outperforming the state-of-the-art with a 9% relative improvement. Additionally, Fairabel surpasses the state-of-the-art by 1.5% on average across five performance metrics, demonstrating a superior ability to preserve software performance.

ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
King's College London (GB), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Software Fairness Analysis and Repair via Causal Model-Guided Data Mutation — Zhenpeng Chen, Ying Xiao, et al. · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS