Thinking While Playing: Football-Specific Dual-Task Performance and Coach-Rated Talent in Youth Football

Background: Football performance emerges from the interaction of technical, physical, and perceptual-cognitive abilities, yet talent identification protocols often assess these components separately. This study examined whether football-specific dual-task (DT) performance, assessed using the Soccer Skills and Cognitive Aptitude Test (SoSCAT), could discriminate between coach-rated talent levels in youth football players. Methods: A total of 181 male football players aged 12–18 years participated in this cross-sectional study and were classified into U14 (n = 70), U16 (n = 63), and U18 (n = 48) categories. Based on coaches’ evaluations, players were also classified as more talented (n = 46) or less talented (n = 135). Participants completed football-specific technical, physical, cognitive, and DT assessments. Results: Coach-rated talented players demonstrated superior football-specific DT performance, with faster completion times under DT conditions (partial η2 = 0.190), a smaller increase in completion time (ΔTime; partial η2 = 0.095), lower DTC (rrβ = −0.351), and fewer decision errors (rrβ = −0.211). Older players showed better absolute DT performance and fewer decision errors, although ΔTime and DTC did not differ between age categories. Age, coach-rated talent status, league goals, and football-specific technical performance remained independently associated with SoSCAT DT performance (adjusted R2 = 0.500). ROC analysis showed good discriminative ability for SoSCAT DT performance (AUC = 0.822). Conclusions: Football-specific DT performance demonstrated good discriminative ability between coach-rated talent levels. The SoSCAT may represent a valuable complementary tool for multidimensional player assessment by integrating football-specific technical execution and perceptual-cognitive demands. However, its interpretation should consider the cross-sectional design, absence of biological maturation assessment, and reliance on coach-rated talent classification.