The framework of prior knowledge in online credibility evaluation

Although prior knowledge has been shown to contribute to reading comprehension, research has paid limited attention to its role in how people read to evaluate the quality of online information. Moreover, empirical studies have largely focused on content knowledge while neglecting other types of prior knowledge. This article introduces The Framework of Prior Knowledge in Online Credibility Evaluation. This framework extends existing credibility evaluation models by incorporating five interconnected prior knowledge types and describes how they can contribute to the effective use of credibility evaluation strategies. Content knowledge includes vocabulary knowledge and broader declarative knowledge, whereas evidence knowledge includes the understanding of different types of evidence and reliable processes for producing evidence. Source knowledge refers to knowledge about the expected expertise, argument position, and intentions of the source, along with source-specific knowledge about authors and organizations. Online genre knowledge involves the understanding of textual forms, structures, conventions, and typical communicative purposes associated with various types of online texts. Finally, cultural knowledge includes an understanding of norms, values, beliefs, and practices shared within a particular society or community. The framework offers theoretical, methodological, and instructional contributions that can significantly inform future research, assessment, and instruction aimed at cultivating critical online readers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Psychologist
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2026.2717081
Primary Topic
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The framework of prior knowledge in online credibility evaluation

Ivar Bråten, Carita Kiili, Julie Coiro
Educational Psychologist
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
article

The framework of prior knowledge in online credibility evaluation

Ivar Bråten, Carita Kiili, Julie Coiro
article en

Abstract

Although prior knowledge has been shown to contribute to reading comprehension, research has paid limited attention to its role in how people read to evaluate the quality of online information. Moreover, empirical studies have largely focused on content knowledge while neglecting other types of prior knowledge. This article introduces The Framework of Prior Knowledge in Online Credibility Evaluation. This framework extends existing credibility evaluation models by incorporating five interconnected prior knowledge types and describes how they can contribute to the effective use of credibility evaluation strategies. Content knowledge includes vocabulary knowledge and broader declarative knowledge, whereas evidence knowledge includes the understanding of different types of evidence and reliable processes for producing evidence. Source knowledge refers to knowledge about the expected expertise, argument position, and intentions of the source, along with source-specific knowledge about authors and organizations. Online genre knowledge involves the understanding of textual forms, structures, conventions, and typical communicative purposes associated with various types of online texts. Finally, cultural knowledge includes an understanding of norms, values, beliefs, and practices shared within a particular society or community. The framework offers theoretical, methodological, and instructional contributions that can significantly inform future research, assessment, and instruction aimed at cultivating critical online readers.

Educational Psychologist
Tampere University (FI), University of Rhode Island (US), University of Oslo (NO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.