Application of the Quadratus Lumborum Block in Pediatric Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Scoping Review

ABSTRACT Background Effective pain control is critical in pediatric gastrointestinal surgery to support recovery and improve postoperative outcomes. Regional anesthetic techniques have gained increasing interest, with the quadratus lumborum block (QLB) emerging as a promising option. As its use expands, this scoping review aimed to map the available evidence on QLB in pediatric gastrointestinal surgery. Specifically, it examined its application, gastrointestinal procedures involved, reported outcomes, and potential advantages and disadvantages. Methods This scoping review followed PRISMA‐ScR guidelines and a published protocol with four predefined research questions. The PCC framework was used to define the review scope: Population, pediatric patients; Concept, QLB; Context, gastrointestinal surgery. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Studies investigating QLB in pediatric gastrointestinal surgery were included. Two reviewers independently conducted screening and data extraction. Results Twenty‐nine studies were included. QLB was predominantly performed using the posterior approach (55%). The administered anesthetic dose varied from 0.3 to 1 mL/kg. No studies measured the plasma concentrations of local anesthetics or assessed dermatomal coverage. The block was applied across various gastrointestinal procedures, most frequently inguinal hernia repair (76%). Outcomes from different abdominal surgeries were often reported in aggregate (59%). Postoperative pain was the primary outcome, evaluated using six different measures, with variability in pain scales, analgesic protocols, and rescue analgesia thresholds. Pain scores were the most common measure, assessed most often using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale (76%). Few studies compared different QLB approaches (10%). QLB offered superior or comparable analgesia compared to other techniques. Conclusion QLB appears effective for pediatric gastrointestinal surgery. However, the literature reveals considerable heterogeneity in outcome measures and study designs. Knowledge gaps remain regarding dose‐related safety, dermatomal coverage, optimal dosing, and comparative efficacy of QLB approaches and gastrointestinal procedure‐specific effectiveness. These findings may guide future research to optimize QLB use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70328
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of the Quadratus Lumborum Block in Pediatric Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Scoping Review

Ann Merete Møller, Birgitte Brandstrup, Mathilde Fredensborg, Sara Marija Abu‐Bakr Christensen
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Application of the Quadratus Lumborum Block in Pediatric Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Scoping Review

Ann Merete Møller, Birgitte Brandstrup, Mathilde Fredensborg, Sara Marija Abu‐Bakr Christensen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Effective pain control is critical in pediatric gastrointestinal surgery to support recovery and improve postoperative outcomes. Regional anesthetic techniques have gained increasing interest, with the quadratus lumborum block (QLB) emerging as a promising option. As its use expands, this scoping review aimed to map the available evidence on QLB in pediatric gastrointestinal surgery. Specifically, it examined its application, gastrointestinal procedures involved, reported outcomes, and potential advantages and disadvantages. Methods This scoping review followed PRISMA‐ScR guidelines and a published protocol with four predefined research questions. The PCC framework was used to define the review scope: Population, pediatric patients; Concept, QLB; Context, gastrointestinal surgery. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Studies investigating QLB in pediatric gastrointestinal surgery were included. Two reviewers independently conducted screening and data extraction. Results Twenty‐nine studies were included. QLB was predominantly performed using the posterior approach (55%). The administered anesthetic dose varied from 0.3 to 1 mL/kg. No studies measured the plasma concentrations of local anesthetics or assessed dermatomal coverage. The block was applied across various gastrointestinal procedures, most frequently inguinal hernia repair (76%). Outcomes from different abdominal surgeries were often reported in aggregate (59%). Postoperative pain was the primary outcome, evaluated using six different measures, with variability in pain scales, analgesic protocols, and rescue analgesia thresholds. Pain scores were the most common measure, assessed most often using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale (76%). Few studies compared different QLB approaches (10%). QLB offered superior or comparable analgesia compared to other techniques. Conclusion QLB appears effective for pediatric gastrointestinal surgery. However, the literature reveals considerable heterogeneity in outcome measures and study designs. Knowledge gaps remain regarding dose‐related safety, dermatomal coverage, optimal dosing, and comparative efficacy of QLB approaches and gastrointestinal procedure‐specific effectiveness. These findings may guide future research to optimize QLB use.

Acta Anaesthesiologica ScandinavicaVol. 70(9)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Herlev Hospital (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Gentofte Hospital (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.