Feasibility of Using Short-Segment Instrumentation and Vertebral Body Reconstruction for the Treatment of Metastatic Disease in the Thoracic Spine

Background/Objectives: When performing a vertebrectomy in the thoracic spine for metastatic disease with a pathological fracture, traditionally, surgeons include two vertebral levels above and below in the instrumented fusion. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of an alternative method involving short-segment instrumentation after a posterior transpedicular thoracic vertebrectomy and reconstruction with pedicle screw fixation at only one level above and below. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our series of thirty consecutive patients treated for non-junctional (T2 to T11), single-level thoracic spinal metastasis via vertebrectomy and reconstruction with posterior short-segment instrumented fusion. The primary outcome was a need for reoperation due to construct failure. The secondary outcomes included local tumor recurrence, neurological function, pain scores, operative time, estimated blood loss, post-operative wound complications, and length of stay. Results: All patients had a minimum Bilsky Grade of 2 and a minimum SINS (Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score) of 10. Two patients suffered perioperative complications, but there was no construct failure or need for revision surgery at any time during the follow-up period. No patients experienced worsening neurological function, and an overall improvement in pain was seen postoperatively (7.67 versus 2.77; p < 0.001; 95% CI: 4.28–5.52). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 605 mL (range, 50–1200 mL; SD, 314.7 mL), and the mean operative time was 260.73 min (range, 169 to 442 min; SD, 64.4 min). The average length of stay was six days. The median length of the follow-up was 24 months (range, 1–65 months; IQR, 12–42 months). Three patients in this cohort had local tumor recurrence (two of these patients suffered from a radioresistant tumor pathology). Conclusions: Our results support the safety and feasibility of this less invasive technique in the management of patients suffering from metastatic disease requiring single-level vertebrectomy and reconstruction in the non-junctional thoracic spine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15187010
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Feasibility of Using Short-Segment Instrumentation and Vertebral Body Reconstruction for the Treatment of Metastatic Disease in the Thoracic Spine

Daniel K. Fahim, Aimen Vanood, Andrew Ragheb, Lee-Onn Chieng et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

Feasibility of Using Short-Segment Instrumentation and Vertebral Body Reconstruction for the Treatment of Metastatic Disease in the Thoracic Spine

Daniel K. Fahim, Aimen Vanood, Andrew Ragheb, Lee-Onn Chieng, Wissam El-Fallal
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: When performing a vertebrectomy in the thoracic spine for metastatic disease with a pathological fracture, traditionally, surgeons include two vertebral levels above and below in the instrumented fusion. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of an alternative method involving short-segment instrumentation after a posterior transpedicular thoracic vertebrectomy and reconstruction with pedicle screw fixation at only one level above and below. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our series of thirty consecutive patients treated for non-junctional (T2 to T11), single-level thoracic spinal metastasis via vertebrectomy and reconstruction with posterior short-segment instrumented fusion. The primary outcome was a need for reoperation due to construct failure. The secondary outcomes included local tumor recurrence, neurological function, pain scores, operative time, estimated blood loss, post-operative wound complications, and length of stay. Results: All patients had a minimum Bilsky Grade of 2 and a minimum SINS (Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score) of 10. Two patients suffered perioperative complications, but there was no construct failure or need for revision surgery at any time during the follow-up period. No patients experienced worsening neurological function, and an overall improvement in pain was seen postoperatively (7.67 versus 2.77; p < 0.001; 95% CI: 4.28–5.52). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 605 mL (range, 50–1200 mL; SD, 314.7 mL), and the mean operative time was 260.73 min (range, 169 to 442 min; SD, 64.4 min). The average length of stay was six days. The median length of the follow-up was 24 months (range, 1–65 months; IQR, 12–42 months). Three patients in this cohort had local tumor recurrence (two of these patients suffered from a radioresistant tumor pathology). Conclusions: Our results support the safety and feasibility of this less invasive technique in the management of patients suffering from metastatic disease requiring single-level vertebrectomy and reconstruction in the non-junctional thoracic spine.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(18)
Oakland University (US), Mayo Clinic Hospital (US), Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak (US), Royal Oak Community Coalition (US), AdventHealth Daytona Beach (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.