Lithological Control of Gas Hydrate Saturation Determined by Pressure Core Analysis in Subpermafrost Reservoirs of the Alaska North Slope (HYDRATE-02 Geo Data Well)

Abstract Quantitatively degassing pressure cores by controlled depressurization is a key approach to characterizing gas hydrate reservoirs by measuring the gas hydrate saturation (Sh) of sediments. We measured Sh for 53 core sections from the Alaska North Slope during the JOGMEC-DOE-USGS Collaborative Gas Hydrate R&D Project in Alaska, from subpermafrost sediments that were later subjected to an extended-duration gas production test. We characterized lithologic influences on Sh using physical property core scans (P-wave velocity, gamma ray attenuation density, and X-ray computed tomography) and grain size measurements. Pressure cores were recovered from the Hydrate-02 Geo Data Well (GDW) at the Kuparuk State 7-11-12 site through two hydrate-bearing sand reservoirs, the B1 and D1 sands, and their finer-grained bounding sediments. Sh reaches very high values (68 to 91% of the pore space) in silty fine sands within the B1 sand, which also contains two lower P-wave velocity intervals (one measured at 30% Sh) within the main reservoir. Sh and grain sizes of the B1 sand are generally higher than the D1 sand, which hosts high Sh (53 to 73%) within its sandy silt to silty fine sands. The heterogeneous silty clay to silt “seal” sediments directly overlying both reservoirs have low Sh (0 to 13%) even in thin, coarser beds, suggesting minimal methane transport between the reservoir and seal. Sh decreases with depth downward toward the base of both the D1 and B1 sands, corresponding to decreasing grain size. These transitions are underlain by silty clay to clayey silt sediments with low Sh (<10%), similar to the seal sediments. Slow depressurization was used to estimate a brackish salinity based on the pressure and temperature of the onset of hydrate dissociation for two core sections within the B1 sand. We show that Sh increases with median grain size, sand content, and porosity but exhibits some variation within the sand beds that is not directly explained by lithology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Fuels
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c04960
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Lithological Control of Gas Hydrate Saturation Determined by Pressure Core Analysis in Subpermafrost Reservoirs of the Alaska North Slope (HYDRATE-02 Geo Data Well)

Melanie Holland, Jun Yoneda, Akihiro Hiruta, Stephen C. Phillips et al.
3 citations
Energy & Fuels
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
8.41
article

Lithological Control of Gas Hydrate Saturation Determined by Pressure Core Analysis in Subpermafrost Reservoirs of the Alaska North Slope (HYDRATE-02 Geo Data Well)

Melanie Holland, Jun Yoneda, Akihiro Hiruta, Stephen C. Phillips, Seth S. Haines, Timothy S. Collett, William F. Waite, Peter J. Schultheiss
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Quantitatively degassing pressure cores by controlled depressurization is a key approach to characterizing gas hydrate reservoirs by measuring the gas hydrate saturation (Sh) of sediments. We measured Sh for 53 core sections from the Alaska North Slope during the JOGMEC-DOE-USGS Collaborative Gas Hydrate R&D Project in Alaska, from subpermafrost sediments that were later subjected to an extended-duration gas production test. We characterized lithologic influences on Sh using physical property core scans (P-wave velocity, gamma ray attenuation density, and X-ray computed tomography) and grain size measurements. Pressure cores were recovered from the Hydrate-02 Geo Data Well (GDW) at the Kuparuk State 7-11-12 site through two hydrate-bearing sand reservoirs, the B1 and D1 sands, and their finer-grained bounding sediments. Sh reaches very high values (68 to 91% of the pore space) in silty fine sands within the B1 sand, which also contains two lower P-wave velocity intervals (one measured at 30% Sh) within the main reservoir. Sh and grain sizes of the B1 sand are generally higher than the D1 sand, which hosts high Sh (53 to 73%) within its sandy silt to silty fine sands. The heterogeneous silty clay to silt “seal” sediments directly overlying both reservoirs have low Sh (0 to 13%) even in thin, coarser beds, suggesting minimal methane transport between the reservoir and seal. Sh decreases with depth downward toward the base of both the D1 and B1 sands, corresponding to decreasing grain size. These transitions are underlain by silty clay to clayey silt sediments with low Sh (<10%), similar to the seal sediments. Slow depressurization was used to estimate a brackish salinity based on the pressure and temperature of the onset of hydrate dissociation for two core sections within the B1 sand. We show that Sh increases with median grain size, sand content, and porosity but exhibits some variation within the sand beds that is not directly explained by lithology.

Energy & Fuels
United States Geological Survey (US), Geotek (United Kingdom) (GB), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
8.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.