Argument in Favor of Reporting Adult-onset Conditions in Prenatal Diagnosis

Prenatal genomic sequencing can detect far more than clinicians conventionally report. Whether adult-onset conditions diagnosed in the fetus should be disclosed prenatally remains debated, and most laboratories and guidelines restrict reporting to childhood-onset disease. We argue that this restriction is not supported by available evidence. Prospective parents consistently elect to receive adult-onset findings, most often to plan for a child's future health. Pediatric and newborn sequencing studies have not demonstrated the psychological, relational, or developmental harms critics anticipated, and pregnancy offers an unmatched opportunity to reach an otherwise unscreened population. Policy should be guided by informed consent and patient autonomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/grf.0000000000001056
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Argument in Favor of Reporting Adult-onset Conditions in Prenatal Diagnosis

Caitlin Baptiste, Ronald J. Wapner, Brittany Arditi, Jessica L. Giordano
Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Argument in Favor of Reporting Adult-onset Conditions in Prenatal Diagnosis

Caitlin Baptiste, Ronald J. Wapner, Brittany Arditi, Jessica L. Giordano
article en

Abstract

Prenatal genomic sequencing can detect far more than clinicians conventionally report. Whether adult-onset conditions diagnosed in the fetus should be disclosed prenatally remains debated, and most laboratories and guidelines restrict reporting to childhood-onset disease. We argue that this restriction is not supported by available evidence. Prospective parents consistently elect to receive adult-onset findings, most often to plan for a child's future health. Pediatric and newborn sequencing studies have not demonstrated the psychological, relational, or developmental harms critics anticipated, and pregnancy offers an unmatched opportunity to reach an otherwise unscreened population. Policy should be guided by informed consent and patient autonomy.

Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Argument in Favor of Reporting Adult-onset Conditions in Prenatal Diagnosis — Caitlin Baptiste, Ronald J. Wapner, et al. · Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS