Osteosarcoma Across the Age Spectrum: Why Outcomes Diverge and Trials Must Adapt

Osteosarcoma clinical presentation, treatment tolerance, and treatment delivery differ across the age spectrum. Adult cohorts are more heterogeneous, with higher proportions of axial and secondary osteosarcoma and greater variation in comorbidity and treatment intensity. Furthermore, emerging genomic studies suggest age-associated differences in tumor complexity and stress-response pathways, whereas direct age-stratified epigenomic and immune-microenvironment data remain limited. These molecular observations are hypothesis-generating and data currently do not support age-specific treatment selection. This narrative review summarizes clinical and biological evidence across age groups, distinguishes prognostic associations from predictive treatment effects, and identifies major confounders and evidence gaps. The available evidence supports age-inclusive prospective trials that model age explicitly, incorporate biomarker-stratified analyses, and report delivered dose intensity, toxicity, and host factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15187017
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Osteosarcoma Across the Age Spectrum: Why Outcomes Diverge and Trials Must Adapt

Samantha H. Collins, Igor Matushansky
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Osteosarcoma Across the Age Spectrum: Why Outcomes Diverge and Trials Must Adapt

Samantha H. Collins, Igor Matushansky
article en

Abstract

Osteosarcoma clinical presentation, treatment tolerance, and treatment delivery differ across the age spectrum. Adult cohorts are more heterogeneous, with higher proportions of axial and secondary osteosarcoma and greater variation in comorbidity and treatment intensity. Furthermore, emerging genomic studies suggest age-associated differences in tumor complexity and stress-response pathways, whereas direct age-stratified epigenomic and immune-microenvironment data remain limited. These molecular observations are hypothesis-generating and data currently do not support age-specific treatment selection. This narrative review summarizes clinical and biological evidence across age groups, distinguishes prognostic associations from predictive treatment effects, and identifies major confounders and evidence gaps. The available evidence supports age-inclusive prospective trials that model age explicitly, incorporate biomarker-stratified analyses, and report delivered dose intensity, toxicity, and host factors.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(18)
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.