WHO IS AT GREATEST RISK FOR FINANCIAL TOXICITY? A NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF BURN SURVIVORS

Financial toxicity is increasingly recognized as an important determinant of recovery, yet limited data exist regarding its prevalence among burn survivors. We evaluated financial toxicity in a nationwide cohort of burn survivors and sought to identify predictors of increased risk. We hypothesized that financial toxicity would be more common among survivors with larger burns. An online survey was distributed to burn survivors recruited through the Phoenix Society for Burn Survivors in 2023. The primary outcome was any financial toxicity, defined as survivors identifying 'financial assistance' or 'impact of injury on income' among their greatest unmet needs. Multivariable logistic regression determined independent predictors. Qualitative responses were analyzed for financial-related themes. Among 178 respondents, 31.5% reported financial toxicity. Financial toxicity was most common among survivors aged 18-44 years (41.8%) and those within 3 years of injury (50.0%). On multivariable analysis, younger age (aOR 3.37, 95% CI 1.21-9.40), larger burns (21-40% TBSA: aOR 4.76, 95% CI 1.34-16.83; >40% TBSA: aOR 7.85, 95% CI 2.21-27.92), and shorter time since injury (< 1 year: aOR 4.72, 95% CI 1.38-16.19; 1-3 years: aOR 5.98, 95% CI 1.98-18.07) were independently associated with increased odds. Qualitative responses highlighted ongoing challenges related to insurance coverage and access to reconstructive and supportive therapies. In conclusion, financial toxicity is an important yet underrecognized component of burn survivorship, particularly among younger survivors, those with larger burns, and those earlier in recovery. Additional efforts are needed to better understand its long-term impact and identify effective interventions to mitigate financial hardship after burn injury.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Burn Care & Research
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irag162
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

WHO IS AT GREATEST RISK FOR FINANCIAL TOXICITY? A NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF BURN SURVIVORS

Ana M Reyes, Shevonne S. Satahoo, Christopher F. O’Neil, Louis R. Pizano et al.
Journal of Burn Care & Research
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

WHO IS AT GREATEST RISK FOR FINANCIAL TOXICITY? A NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF BURN SURVIVORS

Ana M Reyes, Shevonne S. Satahoo, Christopher F. O’Neil, Louis R. Pizano, Joyce Kaufman, Mary Ishii, Carl I. Schulman, Walter A. Ramsey, Michael D. Cobler-Lichter, Jessica M. Delamater, Talia R. Arcieri, Stephen Q Conrad
article en

Abstract

Financial toxicity is increasingly recognized as an important determinant of recovery, yet limited data exist regarding its prevalence among burn survivors. We evaluated financial toxicity in a nationwide cohort of burn survivors and sought to identify predictors of increased risk. We hypothesized that financial toxicity would be more common among survivors with larger burns. An online survey was distributed to burn survivors recruited through the Phoenix Society for Burn Survivors in 2023. The primary outcome was any financial toxicity, defined as survivors identifying 'financial assistance' or 'impact of injury on income' among their greatest unmet needs. Multivariable logistic regression determined independent predictors. Qualitative responses were analyzed for financial-related themes. Among 178 respondents, 31.5% reported financial toxicity. Financial toxicity was most common among survivors aged 18-44 years (41.8%) and those within 3 years of injury (50.0%). On multivariable analysis, younger age (aOR 3.37, 95% CI 1.21-9.40), larger burns (21-40% TBSA: aOR 4.76, 95% CI 1.34-16.83; >40% TBSA: aOR 7.85, 95% CI 2.21-27.92), and shorter time since injury (< 1 year: aOR 4.72, 95% CI 1.38-16.19; 1-3 years: aOR 5.98, 95% CI 1.98-18.07) were independently associated with increased odds. Qualitative responses highlighted ongoing challenges related to insurance coverage and access to reconstructive and supportive therapies. In conclusion, financial toxicity is an important yet underrecognized component of burn survivorship, particularly among younger survivors, those with larger burns, and those earlier in recovery. Additional efforts are needed to better understand its long-term impact and identify effective interventions to mitigate financial hardship after burn injury.

Journal of Burn Care & Research
University of Miami (US), Clinical Pharmacology of Miami (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.