Sociolinguists against the AI hype? AI tools in sociolinguistics scholarship

Abstract This paper examines sociolinguists’ views of and engagement with artificial intelligence technology in sociolinguistics scholarship, an area that has received little systematic attention to date. Drawing on a global survey of 274 respondents, the study reveals that while automatization and AI tools are mainly used for efficiency and experimentation purposes, their adoption for data collection and analysis remains limited. Moreover, sociolinguists express strong reservations about AI, including concerns over ethical, environmental, research integrity, and power-related issues. Our data show that AI technology has not disrupted the epistemological or methodological foundations of sociolinguistics research. We argue that under structural pressures to maximize productivity and efficiency, sociolinguistics positions itself as a cautious field, calling for critical reflection on the so-called AI hype. The study urges continued scrutiny of AI’s implications for the production of sociolinguistic knowledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Linguistics Vanguard
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2025-0212
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sociolinguists against the AI hype? AI tools in sociolinguistics scholarship

Iker Erdocia, Bettina Migge, Britta Schneider
Linguistics Vanguard
Multilingual Education and Policy
article

Sociolinguists against the AI hype? AI tools in sociolinguistics scholarship

Iker Erdocia, Bettina Migge, Britta Schneider
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines sociolinguists’ views of and engagement with artificial intelligence technology in sociolinguistics scholarship, an area that has received little systematic attention to date. Drawing on a global survey of 274 respondents, the study reveals that while automatization and AI tools are mainly used for efficiency and experimentation purposes, their adoption for data collection and analysis remains limited. Moreover, sociolinguists express strong reservations about AI, including concerns over ethical, environmental, research integrity, and power-related issues. Our data show that AI technology has not disrupted the epistemological or methodological foundations of sociolinguistics research. We argue that under structural pressures to maximize productivity and efficiency, sociolinguistics positions itself as a cautious field, calling for critical reflection on the so-called AI hype. The study urges continued scrutiny of AI’s implications for the production of sociolinguistic knowledge.

Linguistics Vanguard
University College Dublin (IE), University of Vienna (AT), Dublin City University (IE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Multilingual Education and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.