Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Oncology: From Clinical Risk Scores to AI-Enabled Precision Onco-Nephrology

Background/Objectives: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication across the cancer care continuum and can compromise kidney function, delay or interrupt anticancer therapy, and worsen renal and oncologic outcomes. This state-of-the-art narrative review examines conventional clinical risk scores and artificial intelligence (AI)- and machine learning (ML)-based approaches to AKI prediction in oncology and identifies priorities for clinical translation. Methods: We conducted iterative searches of PubMed and Google Scholar through July 2026 and screened reference lists of relevant primary studies and reviews. We prioritized oncology-specific model development and validation studies and selectively included conventional scores and observational evidence where dedicated prediction models were unavailable. Results: Prediction evidence is most developed in hospitalized cancer populations, cisplatin exposure, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, and selected oncologic surgical procedures. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation includes an early conventional risk score, whereas evidence for CAR T-cell therapy and targeted therapies remains predominantly observational. Most studies are retrospective, and independent external validation, calibration assessment, fairness evaluation, and prospective workflow implementation remain uncommon. Reported performance cannot be compared directly across studies because outcome definitions, prediction windows, populations, and validation strategies differ. Conclusions: AI- and ML-based AKI prediction may support precision onco-nephrology, but no oncology-specific model has yet demonstrated improved outcomes in a prospective interventional study. Clinical progress will require standardized outcomes, treatment-aware longitudinal data, rigorous external validation, and prediction tools linked to evidence-based response pathways. These advances may ultimately enable precision onco-nephrology by supporting proactive kidney protection while preserving optimal cancer treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18182937
Primary Topic
Acute Kidney Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Oncology: From Clinical Risk Scores to AI-Enabled Precision Onco-Nephrology

Corinne Isnard Bagnis, Adrien Ugon, Bertrand Roudier, Alexandre Homo et al.
Cancers
Acute Kidney Injury Research
article

Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Oncology: From Clinical Risk Scores to AI-Enabled Precision Onco-Nephrology

Corinne Isnard Bagnis, Adrien Ugon, Bertrand Roudier, Alexandre Homo, Camille Fahy, Brena F. Sena, Anthony Van de Putte
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication across the cancer care continuum and can compromise kidney function, delay or interrupt anticancer therapy, and worsen renal and oncologic outcomes. This state-of-the-art narrative review examines conventional clinical risk scores and artificial intelligence (AI)- and machine learning (ML)-based approaches to AKI prediction in oncology and identifies priorities for clinical translation. Methods: We conducted iterative searches of PubMed and Google Scholar through July 2026 and screened reference lists of relevant primary studies and reviews. We prioritized oncology-specific model development and validation studies and selectively included conventional scores and observational evidence where dedicated prediction models were unavailable. Results: Prediction evidence is most developed in hospitalized cancer populations, cisplatin exposure, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, and selected oncologic surgical procedures. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation includes an early conventional risk score, whereas evidence for CAR T-cell therapy and targeted therapies remains predominantly observational. Most studies are retrospective, and independent external validation, calibration assessment, fairness evaluation, and prospective workflow implementation remain uncommon. Reported performance cannot be compared directly across studies because outcome definitions, prediction windows, populations, and validation strategies differ. Conclusions: AI- and ML-based AKI prediction may support precision onco-nephrology, but no oncology-specific model has yet demonstrated improved outcomes in a prospective interventional study. Clinical progress will require standardized outcomes, treatment-aware longitudinal data, rigorous external validation, and prediction tools linked to evidence-based response pathways. These advances may ultimately enable precision onco-nephrology by supporting proactive kidney protection while preserving optimal cancer treatment.

CancersVol. 18(18)
Université Sorbonne Nouvelle (FR), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Renal Association (GB), Sorbonne Université (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Acute Kidney Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.