A Mixed-Methods Assessment of the Maternal Death Surveillance Response in Tanzania as an Information Source Beyond the Numbers: An Opportunity for SDG 2030 Tracking

This study aimed to assess the implementation of the MDSR system. The mixed cross-sectional study was conducted in 12 regions. The quantitative analysis used ordinal intervals: Excellent, Good, Satisfactory and Poor. Qualitative analysis developed themes to inform MDR system implementation. The findings showed that leaders were following up at the health facility, the community, and individual clients. The system implementation at the regional level was Satisfactory (75–84%), and at the district and health facility level was Poor (below 75%). Generally, responses to the action plan at all levels studied were rated Poor. The timeliness of notification to MD was found to be Satisfactory (75–84%) in three regions and Poor in Dar es Salaam and Mwanza. The daily notification of MDs was 57.3% of the 349 weekly reports. The completeness variables improved significantly to Excellent scores (above 95%) after a week, but not for notifications. Therefore, the system produces data that goes beyond numbers, thereby making it not inferior. The system generates MD data through timely notifications and weekly reporting, with the latter yielding twice as much.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trends in Public Health
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/tph1020014
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Mixed-Methods Assessment of the Maternal Death Surveillance Response in Tanzania as an Information Source Beyond the Numbers: An Opportunity for SDG 2030 Tracking

Secilia Kapalata Ng’weshemi, Leonard K. Katalambula, Rachel Nathaniel Manongi, Florina Serbanescu et al.
Trends in Public Health
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

A Mixed-Methods Assessment of the Maternal Death Surveillance Response in Tanzania as an Information Source Beyond the Numbers: An Opportunity for SDG 2030 Tracking

Secilia Kapalata Ng’weshemi, Leonard K. Katalambula, Rachel Nathaniel Manongi, Florina Serbanescu, Ahmad Makuwani, Golden Mwakibo Masika, Josephine Shabani, Grace Elias Magembe, Mzee Masumbuko Nassoro, Rose Mpembeni, Maulid Ahmad Makuwani, Habib Rutakyamirwa Ismail, Phineas Nathaniel Sospeter, Hatibu Salum Kungulilo
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the implementation of the MDSR system. The mixed cross-sectional study was conducted in 12 regions. The quantitative analysis used ordinal intervals: Excellent, Good, Satisfactory and Poor. Qualitative analysis developed themes to inform MDR system implementation. The findings showed that leaders were following up at the health facility, the community, and individual clients. The system implementation at the regional level was Satisfactory (75–84%), and at the district and health facility level was Poor (below 75%). Generally, responses to the action plan at all levels studied were rated Poor. The timeliness of notification to MD was found to be Satisfactory (75–84%) in three regions and Poor in Dar es Salaam and Mwanza. The daily notification of MDs was 57.3% of the 349 weekly reports. The completeness variables improved significantly to Excellent scores (above 95%) after a week, but not for notifications. Therefore, the system produces data that goes beyond numbers, thereby making it not inferior. The system generates MD data through timely notifications and weekly reporting, with the latter yielding twice as much.

Trends in Public HealthVol. 1(2)
Ifakara Health Institute (TZ), Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (TZ), The University of Dodoma (TZ), Moshi Co-operative University (TZ), Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children (TZ), CDC Foundation (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.