Do green and carbon-intensive stock indices exhibit similar beta and cointegration dynamics? Evidence from Indian stock markets

Purpose The study examines the comparative dynamics of the betas of two thematic sector-specific indices, one representing the green sector (proxied by Nifty ESG index) and the other representing carbon-intensive sectors (proxied by the Metals and Oil & Gas indices), with the broader benchmark, Nifty 500. The yardstick of comparison comprises parameters of volatility, sensitivity, stability and risk-adjusted performance. Design/methodology/approach The study collects data for a ten-year period (daily closing prices, January 1, 2016–December 31, 2025) and applies the Kalman Filter to understand the time-varying characteristics of the indices, followed by an estimate of time-varying beta sensitivity using rolling regressions and a test of variability using rolling standard deviations. Parameter stability is tested using structural breaks, while risk-adjusted performance is evaluated using Sharpe and Treynor ratios and co-movement using the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) methodology. Findings The results reveal higher rolling beta sensitivity, less variability and superior risk-adjusted performance of the green sector index as compared to carbon-intensive sector indices. With respect to stability, the green sector index was more stable than the Oil & Gas index but matched the stability of the Metals Index. However, cointegration among the indices was not proved. The study concludes that the green sector index performed better than carbon-intensive sector indices on almost all yardsticks, namely, sensitivity, variability and stability. Research limitations/implications The results reinforce green indices as a relatively less risky and highly stable investment option. The absence of cointegration presents significant diversification opportunities for investors, while for policymakers, the results point to a need for sector-specific policies rather than a uniform policy. Originality/value The novelty lies in making a time-varying comparative analysis of green and carbon-intensive sector indices with respect to parameters of sensitivity, stability and volatility in the Indian context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Business
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ajb-04-2026-0053
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do green and carbon-intensive stock indices exhibit similar beta and cointegration dynamics? Evidence from Indian stock markets

Rakesh Shahani, Sanskriti Thakur
American Journal of Business
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

Do green and carbon-intensive stock indices exhibit similar beta and cointegration dynamics? Evidence from Indian stock markets

Rakesh Shahani, Sanskriti Thakur
article en

Abstract

Purpose The study examines the comparative dynamics of the betas of two thematic sector-specific indices, one representing the green sector (proxied by Nifty ESG index) and the other representing carbon-intensive sectors (proxied by the Metals and Oil & Gas indices), with the broader benchmark, Nifty 500. The yardstick of comparison comprises parameters of volatility, sensitivity, stability and risk-adjusted performance. Design/methodology/approach The study collects data for a ten-year period (daily closing prices, January 1, 2016–December 31, 2025) and applies the Kalman Filter to understand the time-varying characteristics of the indices, followed by an estimate of time-varying beta sensitivity using rolling regressions and a test of variability using rolling standard deviations. Parameter stability is tested using structural breaks, while risk-adjusted performance is evaluated using Sharpe and Treynor ratios and co-movement using the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) methodology. Findings The results reveal higher rolling beta sensitivity, less variability and superior risk-adjusted performance of the green sector index as compared to carbon-intensive sector indices. With respect to stability, the green sector index was more stable than the Oil & Gas index but matched the stability of the Metals Index. However, cointegration among the indices was not proved. The study concludes that the green sector index performed better than carbon-intensive sector indices on almost all yardsticks, namely, sensitivity, variability and stability. Research limitations/implications The results reinforce green indices as a relatively less risky and highly stable investment option. The absence of cointegration presents significant diversification opportunities for investors, while for policymakers, the results point to a need for sector-specific policies rather than a uniform policy. Originality/value The novelty lies in making a time-varying comparative analysis of green and carbon-intensive sector indices with respect to parameters of sensitivity, stability and volatility in the Indian context.

American Journal of Business
Ambedkar University Delhi (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.