Governing Through Responsibility: CSR as an Enabling Condition for Behavioral Alignment in Agri‐Food Supply Chains

ABSTRACT Interorganizational relationships in agri‐food supply chains are marked by strong interdependence and recurrent exposure to behavioral uncertainty. In this context, opportunistic behavior is not an exceptional event, but a persistent risk that can weaken cooperation and disrupt coordination between exchange partners. Although previous research has linked corporate social responsibility (CSR) to relational outcomes and firm performance, CSR has often been approached mainly as a signaling, legitimacy‐oriented, or compliance‐related construct. Less is known about how responsible practices shape expectations and behavior within ongoing buyer–seller relationships. This study addresses this gap by conceptualizing CSR as a set of partner‐perceived responsible practices that operate as observable cues in interorganizational exchange. Rather than treating CSR as a governance mechanism in itself, the study frames it as an enabling condition that supports the operation of relational governance. The argument developed here is that CSR contributes to behavioral alignment through two complementary processes: a normative pathway, whereby responsible practices reinforce shared expectations and directly foster cooperation, and a control‐oriented pathway, whereby CSR strengthens trust, reduces opportunism, and supports cooperation over time. The proposed model is tested using survey data from firms operating in agri‐food supply chains. The results show that CSR has a positive effect on both trust and cooperation. Trust reduces opportunism, opportunism weakens cooperation, and cooperation improves performance. CSR also affects performance indirectly through two relational pathways: a direct cooperation‐based path and a sequential path through trust, opportunism, and cooperation. The stronger indirect effect operates through cooperation, highlighting its central role in translating responsible practices into relational outcomes. These findings extend the understanding of CSR beyond reputational or compliance‐based interpretations. Responsible practices matter not only because they affect how firms are evaluated externally, but also because they shape how partners interpret each other within the exchange. In doing so, CSR helps create the relational conditions under which cooperation can emerge and performance can improve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70987
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Governing Through Responsibility: CSR as an Enabling Condition for Behavioral Alignment in Agri‐Food Supply Chains

José Manuel Santos Jaén, Fernando Gimeno-Arias, Pilar Pérez-Escamez, Rafael Pérez‐Armenteros
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Governing Through Responsibility: CSR as an Enabling Condition for Behavioral Alignment in Agri‐Food Supply Chains

José Manuel Santos Jaén, Fernando Gimeno-Arias, Pilar Pérez-Escamez, Rafael Pérez‐Armenteros
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Interorganizational relationships in agri‐food supply chains are marked by strong interdependence and recurrent exposure to behavioral uncertainty. In this context, opportunistic behavior is not an exceptional event, but a persistent risk that can weaken cooperation and disrupt coordination between exchange partners. Although previous research has linked corporate social responsibility (CSR) to relational outcomes and firm performance, CSR has often been approached mainly as a signaling, legitimacy‐oriented, or compliance‐related construct. Less is known about how responsible practices shape expectations and behavior within ongoing buyer–seller relationships. This study addresses this gap by conceptualizing CSR as a set of partner‐perceived responsible practices that operate as observable cues in interorganizational exchange. Rather than treating CSR as a governance mechanism in itself, the study frames it as an enabling condition that supports the operation of relational governance. The argument developed here is that CSR contributes to behavioral alignment through two complementary processes: a normative pathway, whereby responsible practices reinforce shared expectations and directly foster cooperation, and a control‐oriented pathway, whereby CSR strengthens trust, reduces opportunism, and supports cooperation over time. The proposed model is tested using survey data from firms operating in agri‐food supply chains. The results show that CSR has a positive effect on both trust and cooperation. Trust reduces opportunism, opportunism weakens cooperation, and cooperation improves performance. CSR also affects performance indirectly through two relational pathways: a direct cooperation‐based path and a sequential path through trust, opportunism, and cooperation. The stronger indirect effect operates through cooperation, highlighting its central role in translating responsible practices into relational outcomes. These findings extend the understanding of CSR beyond reputational or compliance‐based interpretations. Responsible practices matter not only because they affect how firms are evaluated externally, but also because they shape how partners interpret each other within the exchange. In doing so, CSR helps create the relational conditions under which cooperation can emerge and performance can improve.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Universidad Isabel I (ES), Universidad de Murcia (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.