Business ownership styles (BOS) of Indigenous Hui entrepreneurs in Ningxia: an economic ethnological study through fieldwork in Ningxia, 2022–2023

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the business ownership style (BOS) of Indigenous Hui entrepreneurs in the Ningxia Autonomous Region of China as a distinctive system of ethical governance embedded within privately owned enterprise (POE) structures. This study examines how moral reasoning, oral tradition and community-based trust mechanisms become institutionalised as operational domestic and international business practices Design/methodology/approach Drawing upon ethnological fieldwork conducted between 2022 and 2024, including interviews, participant observation, oral testimony and student engagement across Ningxia, this study analyses Hui BOS as a historically grounded yet adaptive model of enterprise governance. The research integrates institutional analysis with ethnological inquiry to examine how Hui entrepreneurs sustain trust, legitimacy and resilience across contemporary market conditions. Findings The findings of this study demonstrate that Hui BOS operates through non-familial hiring, servant leadership, ethical reinvestment, mentorship-based capability development, oral trust networks and gradualist growth strategies. Rather than functioning as informal residual traditions, these practices operate as structured governance mechanisms that institutionalise ethical reasoning within enterprise operations. This study further demonstrates that Hui BOS contributes significantly to regional economic resilience, organisational continuity and stakeholder trust. Research limitations/implications The authors limit the academic research included in this paper to those work that specifically address the Hui BOS. Practical implications This study is conducted to develop a practical awareness of the Indigenous ethnic group BOS of the Hui peoples and in doing so breaking away from any monolith thinking in relation to Chinese business practice. Originality/value This paper contributes to international business and institutional theory by demonstrating how Indigenous governance systems can function as durable forms of organisational infrastructure. It extends existing scholarship on entrepreneurship, governance and institutional economics by evidencing how ethical principles become operational governance mechanisms within Indigenous POEs. This study positions Hui BOS as a transferable framework for understanding trust-based governance, sustainable enterprise and alternative models of economic modernity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of International Business and Strategy
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ribs-05-2025-0076
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Business ownership styles (BOS) of Indigenous Hui entrepreneurs in Ningxia: an economic ethnological study through fieldwork in Ningxia, 2022–2023

Robert Anthony Brown, Ian Patrick Austin
Review of International Business and Strategy
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
article

Business ownership styles (BOS) of Indigenous Hui entrepreneurs in Ningxia: an economic ethnological study through fieldwork in Ningxia, 2022–2023

Robert Anthony Brown, Ian Patrick Austin
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the business ownership style (BOS) of Indigenous Hui entrepreneurs in the Ningxia Autonomous Region of China as a distinctive system of ethical governance embedded within privately owned enterprise (POE) structures. This study examines how moral reasoning, oral tradition and community-based trust mechanisms become institutionalised as operational domestic and international business practices Design/methodology/approach Drawing upon ethnological fieldwork conducted between 2022 and 2024, including interviews, participant observation, oral testimony and student engagement across Ningxia, this study analyses Hui BOS as a historically grounded yet adaptive model of enterprise governance. The research integrates institutional analysis with ethnological inquiry to examine how Hui entrepreneurs sustain trust, legitimacy and resilience across contemporary market conditions. Findings The findings of this study demonstrate that Hui BOS operates through non-familial hiring, servant leadership, ethical reinvestment, mentorship-based capability development, oral trust networks and gradualist growth strategies. Rather than functioning as informal residual traditions, these practices operate as structured governance mechanisms that institutionalise ethical reasoning within enterprise operations. This study further demonstrates that Hui BOS contributes significantly to regional economic resilience, organisational continuity and stakeholder trust. Research limitations/implications The authors limit the academic research included in this paper to those work that specifically address the Hui BOS. Practical implications This study is conducted to develop a practical awareness of the Indigenous ethnic group BOS of the Hui peoples and in doing so breaking away from any monolith thinking in relation to Chinese business practice. Originality/value This paper contributes to international business and institutional theory by demonstrating how Indigenous governance systems can function as durable forms of organisational infrastructure. It extends existing scholarship on entrepreneurship, governance and institutional economics by evidencing how ethical principles become operational governance mechanisms within Indigenous POEs. This study positions Hui BOS as a transferable framework for understanding trust-based governance, sustainable enterprise and alternative models of economic modernity.

Review of International Business and Strategy
Edith Cowan University (AU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.