Factors Associated with 6-Minute Walk Distance Improvement During Outpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation After Lung Transplantation

RATIONALE: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended after lung transplantation to optimize recovery. Prior studies have evaluated intensive or specialized PR protocols rather than the 36-session comprehensive outpatient model specified by Medicare. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) improvement and factors associated with rehabilitation response in a Medicare PR program. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic cohort study of 367 lung transplant recipients participating in PR from 2013-2025. The primary outcome was 6MWD. Registry data were linked to obtain pre-transplant demographic, clinical and functional data. Factors associated with 6MWD improvement were evaluated through multivariable regression, inverse probability weighting and machine learning models. RESULTS: Among 367 lung transplant recipients, 286 (78%) completed discharge assessments with median 6MWD improvement of 171 meters (m, 61% relative improvement). Baseline functional capacity was inversely associated with 6MWD improvement (-0.6m per 1m baseline increase [95% CI, -0.7 to -0.5]). Female sex (-44.2m [-64.0 to -24.3]), longer hospital stay (-0.7m/day [-1.3 to -0.1]), and higher BMI (-3.2m per kg/m² [-5.5 to -1.0]) were associated with less improvement. Higher baseline depression scores were paradoxically associated with greater gains (2.4m/PHQ-9 point [0.04 to 4.67], p < 0.05). Neither pre-transplant disease severity (Lung Allocation Score, p = 0.68) nor functional status at transplant (p = 0.33) was associated with rehabilitation response. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of outpatient PR linked to transplant registry data, lung transplant recipients achieved substantial functional improvements. Post-transplant baseline function was inversely associated with gains while pre-transplant disease severity showed no significant association, suggesting removal of ventilatory constraints creates relatively uniform rehabilitation potential. These findings support the real-world effectiveness of the Medicare outpatient PR model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/annalsats/aaoag286
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Associated with 6-Minute Walk Distance Improvement During Outpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation After Lung Transplantation

Justin M. Bachmann, Ashley P. Wright, Robert A. Greevy, Jeremy K. McNatt et al.
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Factors Associated with 6-Minute Walk Distance Improvement During Outpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation After Lung Transplantation

Justin M. Bachmann, Ashley P. Wright, Robert A. Greevy, Jeremy K. McNatt, Jade M Borden, David B Erasmus, Caitlin T Demarest, Konrad Hoetzenecker, Melissa J Putnam, Anil J Trindade, Katelyn S McCloskey, David J Kennedy, Shi Huang, E Wesley Ely
article en

Abstract

RATIONALE: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended after lung transplantation to optimize recovery. Prior studies have evaluated intensive or specialized PR protocols rather than the 36-session comprehensive outpatient model specified by Medicare. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) improvement and factors associated with rehabilitation response in a Medicare PR program. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic cohort study of 367 lung transplant recipients participating in PR from 2013-2025. The primary outcome was 6MWD. Registry data were linked to obtain pre-transplant demographic, clinical and functional data. Factors associated with 6MWD improvement were evaluated through multivariable regression, inverse probability weighting and machine learning models. RESULTS: Among 367 lung transplant recipients, 286 (78%) completed discharge assessments with median 6MWD improvement of 171 meters (m, 61% relative improvement). Baseline functional capacity was inversely associated with 6MWD improvement (-0.6m per 1m baseline increase [95% CI, -0.7 to -0.5]). Female sex (-44.2m [-64.0 to -24.3]), longer hospital stay (-0.7m/day [-1.3 to -0.1]), and higher BMI (-3.2m per kg/m² [-5.5 to -1.0]) were associated with less improvement. Higher baseline depression scores were paradoxically associated with greater gains (2.4m/PHQ-9 point [0.04 to 4.67], p < 0.05). Neither pre-transplant disease severity (Lung Allocation Score, p = 0.68) nor functional status at transplant (p = 0.33) was associated with rehabilitation response. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of outpatient PR linked to transplant registry data, lung transplant recipients achieved substantial functional improvements. Post-transplant baseline function was inversely associated with gains while pre-transplant disease severity showed no significant association, suggesting removal of ventilatory constraints creates relatively uniform rehabilitation potential. These findings support the real-world effectiveness of the Medicare outpatient PR model.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society
VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.