Teleworking as the main risk factor for sedentary behavior: the COVISTRESS international study

Background If teleworking is already associated with prolonged sedentary behavior, the literature lacks an integrating model with all putative influencing variables, as well as a sufficient number of participants to explore extreme sitting behavior. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the influence of teleworking on sitting time, considering main sociodemographic, occupational and lifestyle factors. Methods The COVISTRESS study is an international observational study, using self-reported questionnaires (REDCap® software). We used linear and logistic multivariate model to assess the impact of telework on sitting time concomitantly with other sociodemographic, occupational, and lifestyle variables. Results 6,653 respondents were included. The mean sitting time was 5.6 ± 3.4h/day, with 15.2% of respondents sitting for >8-14h/day and 1.6% sitting >14 hours/day. Workers who teleworked 0%, 1–25%, 26–50%, 51–75%, 76–99%, and 100% respectively sat on average 4.9 ± 3.2h/day, 5.8 ± 3.2h/day, 6.4 ± 3.1h/day, 6.5 ± 3.8h/day, 7.6 ± 3.5h/day, and 9.1 ± 4.3h/day, and the prevalence of workers sitting >14h/day increased from 1.5%, 1.9%, 0.4%, 3.2%, 5.4% to 10.7%. Compared with workers who did not telework, the risk of sitting 8–14 h/day was multiplied by 1.9 (1.2 to 3.0) for people working 1–25% in telework, by 4.7 (2.2 to 9.7) for people working 26–50% in telework, by 4.3 (1.5 to 12.2) for people working 51–75% in telework, and by 9.2 (1.6 to 51.5) for people working >75% in telework; the risk of sitting ≥ 14h/day was multiplied by 5.8 (1.07 to 31.5) for people working 51–75% in telework and dramatically increased by 34.3 (3.71 to 317) for people working >75% in telework in multivariate model. Conclusion Teleworking is the strongest risk factor for high sitting time, with a marked dose-response relation. While several other sociodemographic, occupational, and lifestyle factors showed association with sitting time in univariate model, many of these relationships weakened or disappeared in the multivariate models, except telework that remained the most consistent determinants of sedentary behavior when concomitantly put together with all other variables. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04538586

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356764
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teleworking as the main risk factor for sedentary behavior: the COVISTRESS international study

Morteza Charkhabi, Binh Quach, Martial Mermillod, Bruno Pereira et al.
PLoS ONE
Work-Family Balance Challenges
article

Teleworking as the main risk factor for sedentary behavior: the COVISTRESS international study

Morteza Charkhabi, Binh Quach, Martial Mermillod, Bruno Pereira, Ukadike C. Ugbolue, Alistair Cole, Hijrah Nasir, Reza Bagheri, Fréderic Dutheil, Maëlys Clinchamps, Marek Žák, Martine Duclos, Julien S. Baker, David Thivel, Jiao Jiao, The COVISTRESS network
article en

Abstract

Background If teleworking is already associated with prolonged sedentary behavior, the literature lacks an integrating model with all putative influencing variables, as well as a sufficient number of participants to explore extreme sitting behavior. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the influence of teleworking on sitting time, considering main sociodemographic, occupational and lifestyle factors. Methods The COVISTRESS study is an international observational study, using self-reported questionnaires (REDCap® software). We used linear and logistic multivariate model to assess the impact of telework on sitting time concomitantly with other sociodemographic, occupational, and lifestyle variables. Results 6,653 respondents were included. The mean sitting time was 5.6 ± 3.4h/day, with 15.2% of respondents sitting for >8-14h/day and 1.6% sitting >14 hours/day. Workers who teleworked 0%, 1–25%, 26–50%, 51–75%, 76–99%, and 100% respectively sat on average 4.9 ± 3.2h/day, 5.8 ± 3.2h/day, 6.4 ± 3.1h/day, 6.5 ± 3.8h/day, 7.6 ± 3.5h/day, and 9.1 ± 4.3h/day, and the prevalence of workers sitting >14h/day increased from 1.5%, 1.9%, 0.4%, 3.2%, 5.4% to 10.7%. Compared with workers who did not telework, the risk of sitting 8–14 h/day was multiplied by 1.9 (1.2 to 3.0) for people working 1–25% in telework, by 4.7 (2.2 to 9.7) for people working 26–50% in telework, by 4.3 (1.5 to 12.2) for people working 51–75% in telework, and by 9.2 (1.6 to 51.5) for people working >75% in telework; the risk of sitting ≥ 14h/day was multiplied by 5.8 (1.07 to 31.5) for people working 51–75% in telework and dramatically increased by 34.3 (3.71 to 317) for people working >75% in telework in multivariate model. Conclusion Teleworking is the strongest risk factor for high sitting time, with a marked dose-response relation. While several other sociodemographic, occupational, and lifestyle factors showed association with sitting time in univariate model, many of these relationships weakened or disappeared in the multivariate models, except telework that remained the most consistent determinants of sedentary behavior when concomitantly put together with all other variables. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04538586

PLoS ONEVol. 21(9)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Hong Kong Baptist University (HK), Jan Kochanowski University (PL), Université Lumière Lyon 2 (FR), Université Clermont Auvergne (FR), University of Isfahan (IR), University of Clermont Auvergne (FR), Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand (FR), Clermont Université (FR), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (FR), University of the West of Scotland (GB), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.