“Resuscitation on the go”- Musculoskeletal discomfort, CPR quality and provider experiences in a transit ambulance setting: A simulated, mixed-methods study

Abstract Background Performing high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in a moving ambulance poses biomechanical and ergonomic challenges. This pilot study aimed to evaluate musculoskeletal discomfort, CPR quality, and provider posture, while exploring the experiences of healthcare providers delivering CPR in a moving ambulance. Methods A mixed-methods study involving 30 Emergency Medical Service (EMS) providers and students aged 18–40 years trained in Basic Life Support was conducted. Participants performed CPR simulation in an in-hospital stationary setting and a moving ambulance using a Little Anne ® QCPR mannequin (Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway). Musculoskeletal discomfort was assessed before and after CPR in the moving ambulance using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale. CPR quality parameters, including compression score, depth, rate, recoil, and chest compression fraction, were recorded using the QCPR ® app. Body posture was assessed using mean trunk and elbow angles during compression and recoil. Semi-structured interviews explored participants’ experiences. Results Median pain scores increased significantly after CPR in the moving ambulance [0 (0, 2.75) before vs. 4 (0, 6) after; p < 0.001]. The most common pain sites were the lumbar region and wrists. Chest compression score and good rate percentage were lower in the moving setting. Trunk and elbow angles showed greater flexion in the moving ambulance, with changes observed across consecutive CPR cycles. Qualitative analysis revealed themes of physical fatigue, balance issues, safety concerns, and ergonomic limitations. Participants recommended simulation-based training, improved ambulance design, and mechanical CPR devices. Conclusion CPR in a moving ambulance was associated with increased musculoskeletal discomfort and lower CPR quality metrics. Ergonomic modifications, provider training, and mechanical aids may help address these challenges. Further studies with larger and more diverse populations and real-world transport conditions are warranted. Trial registration Prospectively registered in Clinical Trial Registry India (CTRI/2024/09/073482) on September 5th, 2024.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Emergency Medicine
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-026-01365-0
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Resuscitation on the go”- Musculoskeletal discomfort, CPR quality and provider experiences in a transit ambulance setting: A simulated, mixed-methods study

Prithvishree Ravindra, Ankit Kumar Sahu, Abraham Samuel Babu, Vimal Krishnan S et al.
International Journal of Emergency Medicine
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

“Resuscitation on the go”- Musculoskeletal discomfort, CPR quality and provider experiences in a transit ambulance setting: A simulated, mixed-methods study

Prithvishree Ravindra, Ankit Kumar Sahu, Abraham Samuel Babu, Vimal Krishnan S, Caroline Ashritha Maben, Lavanya B. N., Mohammad Khalid
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Performing high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in a moving ambulance poses biomechanical and ergonomic challenges. This pilot study aimed to evaluate musculoskeletal discomfort, CPR quality, and provider posture, while exploring the experiences of healthcare providers delivering CPR in a moving ambulance. Methods A mixed-methods study involving 30 Emergency Medical Service (EMS) providers and students aged 18–40 years trained in Basic Life Support was conducted. Participants performed CPR simulation in an in-hospital stationary setting and a moving ambulance using a Little Anne ® QCPR mannequin (Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway). Musculoskeletal discomfort was assessed before and after CPR in the moving ambulance using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale. CPR quality parameters, including compression score, depth, rate, recoil, and chest compression fraction, were recorded using the QCPR ® app. Body posture was assessed using mean trunk and elbow angles during compression and recoil. Semi-structured interviews explored participants’ experiences. Results Median pain scores increased significantly after CPR in the moving ambulance [0 (0, 2.75) before vs. 4 (0, 6) after; p < 0.001]. The most common pain sites were the lumbar region and wrists. Chest compression score and good rate percentage were lower in the moving setting. Trunk and elbow angles showed greater flexion in the moving ambulance, with changes observed across consecutive CPR cycles. Qualitative analysis revealed themes of physical fatigue, balance issues, safety concerns, and ergonomic limitations. Participants recommended simulation-based training, improved ambulance design, and mechanical CPR devices. Conclusion CPR in a moving ambulance was associated with increased musculoskeletal discomfort and lower CPR quality metrics. Ergonomic modifications, provider training, and mechanical aids may help address these challenges. Further studies with larger and more diverse populations and real-world transport conditions are warranted. Trial registration Prospectively registered in Clinical Trial Registry India (CTRI/2024/09/073482) on September 5th, 2024.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.